lauantai 13. helmikuuta 2016

Advaita Enlightenment And Dzogchen Enlightenment

Advaita Enlightenment And
Dzogchen Enlightenment

The next story, told by Sam Harris, demonstrates how the view and experience of enlightenment differ between two teachers: Papaji (H.W.L. Poonja, a well known advaita vedanta guru, disciple of Ramana Maharishi) and Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche, a well known Tibetan vajrayana buddhism and dzogchen master.



I have linked two demonstrative videos where the mentioned teachers meditate. From them one can see how different their states are. The other one being quite confused and unclear and the other one being matured, clear and open.



- Kim Katami, 14.2.2016.




From Sam Harris' book Waking up, ch. 4:

”Poonja-ji’s influence on me was profound, especially because it came as a corrective to all the strenuous and unsatisfying efforts I had been making in meditation up to that point. But the dangers inherent in his approach soon became obvious. The all-or-nothing quality of Poonjaji’s teaching obliged him to acknowledge the full enlightenment of any person who was grandiose or manic enough to claim it. Thus, I repeatedly witnessed fellow students declare their complete and undying freedom, all the while appearing quite ordinary—or worse. In certain cases, these people had clearly had some sort of breakthrough, but Poonja-ji’s insistence upon the finality of every legitimate insight led many of them to delude themselves about their spiritual attainments. Some left India and became gurus. From what I could tell, Poonja-ji gave everyone his blessing to spread his teachings in this way. He once suggested that I do it, and yet it was clear to me that I was not qualified to be anyone’s guru. Nearly twenty years have passed, and I’m still not. Of course, from Poonja-ji’s point of view, this is an illusion. And yet there simply is a difference between a person like myself, who is generally distracted by thought, and one who isn’t and cannot be. I don’t know where to place Poonja-ji on this continuum of wisdom, but he appeared to be a lot farther along than his students. Whether Poonja-ji was capable of seeing the difference between himself and other people, I do not know. But his insistence that no difference existed began to seem either dogmatic or delusional.

On one occasion, events conspired to perfectly illuminate the flaw in Poonja-ji’s teaching. A small group of experienced practitioners (among us several teachers of meditation) had organized a trip to India and Nepal to spend ten days with Poonja-ji in Lucknow, followed by ten days in Kathmandu, to receive teachings on the Tibetan Buddhist practice of Dzogchen. As it happened, during our time in Lucknow, a woman from Switzerland became “enlightened” in Poonja-ji’s presence. For the better part of a week, she was celebrated as something akin to the next Buddha. Poonja-ji repeatedly put her forward as evidence of how fully the truth could be realized without making any effort at all in meditation, and we had the pleasure of seeing this woman sit beside Poonja-ji on a raised platform expounding upon how blissful it now was in her corner of the universe. She was, in fact, radiantly happy, and it was by no means clear that Poonja-ji had made a mistake in recognizing her. She would say things like “There is nothing but consciousness, and there is no difference between it and reality itself.” Coming from such a nice, guileless person, there was little reason to doubt the profundity of her experience.

When it came time for our group to leave India for Nepal, this woman asked if she could join us. Because she was such good company, we encouraged her to come along. A few of us were also curious to see how her realization would appear in another context. And so it came to pass that a woman whose enlightenment had just been confirmed by one of the greatest living exponents of Advaita Vedanta was in the room when we received our first teachings from Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche, who was generally thought to be one of the greatest living Dzogchen masters. Of all the Buddhist teachings, those of Dzogchen most closely resemble the teachings of Advaita. The two traditions seek to provoke the same insight into the nonduality of consciousness, but, generally speaking, only Dzogchen makes it absolutely clear that one must practice this insight to the point of stability and that one can do so without succumbing to the dualistic striving that haunts most other paths.

At a certain point in our discussions with Tulku Urgyen, our Swiss prodigy declared her boundless freedom in terms similar to those she had used to such great effect with Poonja-ji. After a few highly amusing exchanges, during which we watched Tulku Urgyen struggle to understand what our translator was telling him, he gave a short laugh and looked the woman over with renewed interest.

“How long has it been since you were last lost in thought?”
he asked.
“I haven’t had any thoughts for over a week,”
the woman replied.
Tulku Urgyen smiled.
“A week?”
“Yes.”
“No thoughts?”
“No, my mind is completely still. It’s just pure consciousness.”
“That’s very interesting. Okay, so this is what is going to happen now: We are all going to wait for you to have your next thought. There’s no hurry. We are all very patient people. We are just going to sit here and wait. Please tell us when you notice a thought arise in your mind.”

It is difficult to convey what a brilliant and subtle intervention this was. It may have been the most inspired moment of teaching I have ever witnessed. After a few moments, a look of doubt appeared on our friend’s face.

“Okay... Wait a minute... Oh... That could have been a thought there... Okay...”
Over the next thirty seconds, we watched this woman’s enlightenment completely unravel. It became clear that she had been merely thinking about how expansive her experience of consciousness had become—how it was perfectly free of thought, immaculate, just like space—without noticing that she was thinking incessantly. She had been telling herself the story of her enlightenment—and she had been getting away with it because she happened to be an extraordinarily happy person for whom everything was going very well for the time being.

This was the danger of nondual teachings of the sort that Poonja-ji was handing out to all comers. It was easy to delude oneself into thinking that one had achieved a permanent breakthrough, especially because he insisted that all breakthroughs must be permanent. What the Dzogchen teachings make clear, however, is that thinking about what is beyond thought is still thinking, and a glimpse of selflessness is generally only the beginning of a process that must reach fruition. Being able to stand perfectly free of the feeling of self is the start of one’s spiritual journey, not its end.”

Links


Advaita-valaistuminen ja Dzogchen-valaistuminen

Advaita-valaistuminen ja

Dzogchen-valaistuminen



Seuraava Sam Harrisin kertoma tarina kertoo erinomaisesn selkeästi kuinka merkittävästi tunnetun advaita vedanta gurun ja Ramana Maharishin oppilaan, Papajin (H.W.L Poonja) ja tunnetun tiibetiläisen dzogchenmestarin Tulku Urgyen Rinpochen näkemykset ja kokemukset valaistumisesta eroavat toisistaan.



On tosiasia, että se minkä olen itse määrittänyt termillä ”herääminen” on osa huomattavan laajaa mielen puhdistamisen kokonaisuutta, jota myös henkisen kehityksen poluksi kutsutaan.



Olen linkittänyt alle kaksi demonstratiivista videota joilla em. opettajat meditoivat. Niistä voi nähdä kuinka erilaisessa mielenmaisemassa he ovat, toinen tunkkaisen sekavassa, toinen selkeässä ja avarassa.



Olen linkittänyt myös tekemäni bhumi-analyysin, joka esittää täsmällisen kehitysasteen jolla sekä Papaji, että Tulku Urgyen olivat.



- Kim Katami, 14.2.2016.



Open Heart,








Sitaatti Sam Harrisin kirjasta ”Herääminen. Opas uskonnottomaan henkisyyteen” s. 158-161, alkuteos Waking up.



”Poonjaji (Papaji) vaikutti minuun syvällisesti erityisesti, koska hänen käsityksensä olivat vastapainoa siihenastisille, uuvuttaville ja epätyydyttäville ponnisteluilleni meditaation parissa. Mutta hänen menetelmänsä sisältyvät vaarat kävivät pian ilmi. Poonjajin kaikki tai ei mitään-opetustyyli velvoitti hänet tunnustamaan valaistuneeksi jokaisen, joka oli kyllin mahtaileva tai kiihkomielinen julistaaksen sitä olevansa. Niinpä todistin toistuvasti, kuinka kanssaopiskelijani julistivat saavuttaneensa täydellisen ja ikuisen vapauden, vaikka mikään heissä ei poikennut tavallisesta – tai jos poikkesi, niin huonoon suuntaan. Joissakin tapauksissa nämä ihmiset olivat selvästi tehneet jonkinlaisen läpimurron, mutta koska Poonjaji piti itsepintaisesti kiinni siitä, että oivallus on todellinen vain, jos se on lopullinen, se sai monet pettämään itseään henkisten saavutusten suhteen. Jotkut lähtivät Intiasta ja ryhtyivät guruiksi. Tietääkseni heillä kaikilla oli Poonjajin siunaus levittää hänen oppejaan. Kerran hän ehdotti sitä minullekin, vaikka minulle itselleni oli selvää, että minusta ei ollut kenenkään guruksi. Lähes kaksikymmentä vuotta myöhemmin minusta ei edelleenkään ole siihen. Poonjajin näkökulmasta tämä on tietenkin harhaa. Mutta on yksinkertaisesti eri asia olla minunkaltaiseni ihminen, joka tavallisesti ajautuu ajatusten vietäväksi, kuin joku, jolle niin ei käy ja jolle se ei ylipäätään ole edes mahdollista. En tiedä, mihin Poonjaji sijoittuu tällä viisauden jatkumolla, mutta hän vaikutti olevan paljon oppilaitaan pidemmällä. En tiedä, pystyikö Poonjaji näkemään itsensä ja muiden välisen eron. Hänen hellittämätön näkemyksensä, jonka mukaan mitään eroa ei ole, alkoi kuitenkin vaikuttaa dogmaattiselta ja harhaiselta.



Erään tapahtumasarjan seurauksena Poonjajin opetusten epäkohdat nousivat selvästi esiin. Pieni ryhmä kokeneita meditaation harjoittajia (joukossamme oli monta meditaatio-opettajaa) oli järjestänyt matkan Intiaan ja Nepaliin. Tarkoituksena oli viettää kymmenen päivää Lucknow'ssa Poonjajin luona ja sen jälkeen opiskella Kathmandussa kymmenen päivää tiibetinbuddhalaista dzogchenharjoitusta. Kuinka ollakaan, Lucknow'ssa ollessamme eräs sveitsiläinen nainen ”valaistui” Poonjajin läsnäollessa. Suurimman osan viikkoa naista juhlittiin kuin uutta Buddhaa. Poonjaji esitti toistuvasti naisen olevan todiste siitä, että totuuden täydellinen oivaltaminen on mahdollista, vaikka ei meditoisi lainkaan, ja meillä oli ilo nähdä naisen istuvan Poonjajin vierellä korokkeella ja kuulla hänen selittävän, kuinka autuasta hänen olonsa maailmankaikkeudessa nyt olikaan. Hän todella säteili iloa, eikä mikään viitannut siihen, että Poonjaji olisi erehtynyt tunnustaessaan hänet. Naisella oli tapana sanoa sellaisia kuin ”Ei ole muuta kuin tietoisuus, eikä sen ja todellisuuden välillä ole mitään eroa.” Hän oli erittäin mukava ja vilpitön ihminen, eikä hänen kokemuksensa syvyyttä ollut siksi syytä epäillä.



Kun tuli aika meidän ryhmämme lähteä Intiasta Nepaliin, nainen kysyi, saisiko hän tulla mukaamme. Hän oli hyvää seuraa, joten kehotimme häntä lähtemään matkaamme. Jotkut meistä olivat myös uteliaita näkemään, miten hänen valaistumisensa ilmenisi toisenlaisessa ympäristössä. Ja niin nainen, jonka valaistumisen oli vastikään vahvistanut yksi merkittävimmistä advaita vedantan elossa olevista edustajista, istui samassa huoneessa, jossa saimme ensimmäiset opetuksemme Tulku Urgyen Rinpochelta, jota pidettiin yleisesti yhtenä merkittävimmistä elossa olevista dzogchenmestareista.



Kaikista buddhalaisista opeista dzogchenin opit muistuttavat eniten advaitan oppeja. Molemmissa perinteissä pyritään samaan oivallukseen, näkemään tietoisuuden ei-dualistinen luonne, mutta yleensä vain dzogchen tekee ehdottoman selväksi, että tämä oivallus vaatii harjoittamista, kunnes se muuttuu pysyväksi eikä ihminen enää joudu antamaan periksi dualistisille pyrkimyksille, jotka ovat useimpien muiden polkujen vaivana.



Eräässä vaiheessa Tulku Urgyenin kanssa käymäämme keskustelua sveitsiläinen ihmenaisemme puhkesi julistamaan ääretöntä vapauden tilaansa käyttäen samoja ilmauksia, joilla oli niin suuri vaikutus Poonjajihin. Saimme seurata paria hupaisaa sananvaihtoa, joiden aikana Tulku Urgyen yritti ymmärtää, mitä tulkkimme hänelle kertoi. Lopulta hän naurahti lyhyesti ja katsoi naista entistä kiinnostuneemmin.



”Koska viimeksi ajatukset valtasivat sinut?” hän kysyi.

”Minulla ei ole ollut ainuttakaan ajatusta yli viikkoon”, nainen vastasi.

Tulku Urgyen hymyili.

”Viikkoon?”

”Niin.”

”Ei lainkaan ajatuksia?”

”Ei, mieleni on täysin rauhallinen. On vain puhdas tietoisuus.”

”Erittäin mielenkiintoista. Nyt tehdään niin, että me kaikki odotamme, että sinulle tulee ajatus. Ei ole mitään kiirettä. Me kaikki olemme hyvin kärsivällisiä ihmisiä. Me vain istumme tässä ja odotamme. Kerrotko sitten, kun huomaat mielessäsi ajatuksen.”



Tämän väliintulon nerokkuutta ja hienovaraisuutta on vaikea pukea sanoiksi. Se saattoi hyvin olla kaikkein innostavin opetustilanne, missä olen koskaan ollut.

Hetken kuluttua ystävämme kasvoille ilmestyi epäilevä ilme.



”Okei... Hetkinen... Öh... Tuo oli ehkä ajatus... Okei...”



Seuraavan puolen minuutin aikana näimme, kuinka naisen valaistuminen haihtui kuin tuhka tuuleen. Oli selvää, että hän oli vain ajatellut, kuinka avara hänen tietoisuudestaan oli tullut, että siinä ei ollut ajatuksen ajatusta, että se oli täydellisen puhdas, kuin avaruus, huomaamatta ajattelevansa lakkaamatta. Hän oli kertonut itselleen valaistuneensa ja uskonut siihen, koska hän sattui olemaan epätavallisen iloinen ihminen, jonka elämässä kaikki oli tuolloin erittäin hyvällä tolalla.



Tällainen oli vaara, joka piili Poonjajin luokseen tuleville jakamissa ei-dualistisissa opetuksissa. Itseään oli helppo pettää ja ajatella saavuttaneensa pysyvän läpimurron, varsinkin koska Poonjaji piti itsepintaisesti kiinni siitä, että kaikkien läpimurtojen on väistämättä oltava pysyviä. Dzogchen-opetukset tekevät selväksi, että sen ajattelu, mikä on ajattelun tuolla puolen, on yhä ajattelua, ja välähdys minättömyydestä on yleensä vain alku prosessille, joka tulee vielä loppuun saakka. Täydellinen irrottautuminen minuudesta on vasta henkisen matkan alku, ei sen päätepiste.”



Linkkejä










perjantai 5. helmikuuta 2016

Practice tantra instead of theravada

Practice tantra instead of theravada

Question: I do meditate in the morning and evening anapanasati or the body scan method of Goenka. Should i keep doing that? Is the technique as i use helpful or should i try a different technique witch you can point me to?

Baba: Body scanning and breath following are basic practices of most meditation traditions. I also teach the classic methods of shamatha and vipashyana in Wisdom Meditations of Vimalamitra. They are part of the Open Heart syllabus but only partially in a central role. We don't do these practices in the same way they do in Theravada but more from a dzogchen point of view (Vimalamitra was and still is one the greatest dzogchen masters ever). This means that we have some special tricks inside these commonly practiced techniques of anapanasati. But anyway, in our system we do these practices only as a "further study". At the moment we have a 3-year study group called "Bodhi" going on which focuses on studying Wisdom Meditations. These practices, as we do them, have a lot to do with ati yoga or Ati-meditation/Space Gazing about which I have written in the FB-groups.

- When it comes to purifying and clearing of the mind (object vipashyana, karmic purification) we use tantric practice called Tibetan Heart Yoga. We prefer tantric practices for vipashyana (tantric vipashyana) because they are easier and faster than the classic ways of vipassana practice. A proof of this is that there has been been no lay masters in the Theravadan tradition in ages. That's because their method requires full attention and a lot of time, that of a monastic monk, if one is to achieve complete purification of mind/karmic purity. The result of these both approaches are the same but the techniques vary in their effectiveness. I know because I've done both. So in regards to this matter of which practice you could or should do as an ordinary Western layman who has began his practices as a grown adult, I say, go for tantra so you get to the point and results much faster.

Baba Kim Katami,
Helsinki, Finland

Open Heart,

torstai 4. helmikuuta 2016

About my masters and Sivakami

Kim wrote:

Hello D,


Traditions, yeah. I have a bit mixed feelings about long traditions these days. When thinking about the number of only buddhist lineages, not to mention others, existing today, which are numerous, I am not that convinced of their ability in keeping teachings alive. There is so much useless baggage.

I've studied with about 3 dozen teachers and masters, both in and out the physical body, but my main teacher who really got me started, after a number of years when I hit my head into patriarchal zen, was an American housewife, a liberated arhat and a mystic of very high caliber. Her name was Sara or Sivakami and she was very private person. She left her body  in 2010. She got her initial transmission from Yogananda's student back in 1976, when she was 36 or 37 years old. The second time she sat down to practice those techniques she had learned, she spent 10 hours in immersion and during the next 4 months that same kept happening everyday. It was tough on her body as her mind was completely transformed, all her personal karmas burned. So, she got her initiation from a physical teacher in a lineage (which by the way was started 3 generations earlier by a non-physical master called Babaji) but after that initial samadhi streak, she started having non-physical teachers and masters visit her both when awake and when asleep. Lama Thubten Yeshe, after he left his body the previous time, was one of them. He offered Sivakami to take his teachings but she kindly refused because she was never that keen about the buddhist vibe. She was pretty much a heavily meditating bhakta all her life. She also had the fortune to witness on two  non-physical masters appear in physical form to her. One of them was Babaji known from Yogananda's book, and the other one was a shaivite master called Thirumular, the author of the famous Thirumandiram, a shaiva classic. So, anyway through her initial contant through Yogananda's disciple, something clicked and she started meeting all these masters from many traditions in astral form. It sounds pretty wild... but to me what she later passed to me were of true quality... compared to teachings that I've received from many lamas or gurus alive today. Her mind and teaching was juicy and fresh, delicious. That freshness didn't come from a tradition that had been kept alive for centuries in a physical form but came from these non-physical mahasiddhas, mostly Babaji and Mular.

So it turned out later that I also had a karmic link to these masters who asked Sivakami to teach. It was her who re-initiated me into this congregation of masters which in turn enabled me to initiate my work, part of which is about helping people get awakened. Like I've said before I didn't learn the two part method that I use when guiding people from any living teacher. It came to me intuitively, a memory from past lives. Later I read they use the same formula in some lineage of dzogchen... So fast forward to this day... I've studied, worked and received transmission from many non-physical masters, yogis and buddhas. I felt for years that I wanted to find a rinpoche or some lama to study with but I don't feel like that anymore because buddhas in the physical are so extremely rare. So what all these traditions out there can offer is quite limited and rarely of superb quality, I feel.
I didn't mean to babble and sorry for keeping so long but I just wanted to say this as "traditions that keep the teachings alive" don't always mean "just physical".

Kim Katami
18.1.2016. 

Open Heart, www.openheart.fi

Awakening and the end of suffering

Awakening and the end of suffering

JP wrote:
How does your version of awakening/stream entry relate to suffering? How much suffering is released upon awakening? How much craving/desire?
The Buddha apparently said that upon stream entry the amount of suffering that goes away is comparable to a large mountain. While the amount of suffering that remains is only a few pebbles. From what I've seen of LU, and other direct pointing methods their awakening does not come anywhere near (nor even here and the MTCB, this kind of dramatic reduction in suffering. Why do you think that is? Are the direct pointers really talking about the same thing when they say 'awakening' as the old buddhists?


Baba wrote:
Hello JP,
Yes. I often compare the delusional psychology of our's to a cart wheel where the center of it would be "me", the spokes whatever mental and emotional content and the outer rim the subconscious mind. If you take the center out and the wheel keeps turning, it cannot help but collapse under weight. That's how I've experienced it and heard my friends tell about it. So if I would have to choose between a mountain or pebbles, awakening as defined and experienced here removes a mountain of suffering, for sure, no doubt about it.


I am not a big fan of LU (Liberation Unleashed) even though on the other hand what they do is way better than nothing. I think they are a bit too hasty in their ways and views. There are strange views involved, like neo-advaita influences which can be very unhealthy and problematic in the long run. We have to remember that awakening is the first permanent stage of spiritual attainment but not by any means the final one. So, we need to put awakening into context. It is actually silly how many seem to think that, "Awakening is all there is and that's it, you're done". Not at all. One has to be very obsessed with being awakened if you don't figure it out pretty soon after awakening.

I am not an exponent of formal traditional buddhism. And I haven't received a permission to teach from any physical buddhist teacher, though I have from a few non-physical masters known from the buddhist tradition. So, I do not have orthodox buddhist authority and therefore I cannot say whether my stream entry would be qualified by the modern ajahn's or not. And of course the followers of orthodox theravada say that no, what I'm talking about is not according to buddha dharma. Maybe they say that or not, makes no difference to me or any of the people who awakened through Open heart. What matters is that the primary cause of delusion, confusion and suffering has been removed. It makes all the difference.

- Baba Kim Katami
19.1.2016

Open Heart, www.openheart.fi

Loving kindness of awareness

Loving kindness of awareness

KL wrote: How does someone who had a traumatic childhood and very little concept of what love is cultivate metta? I need some hardcore heart melting pointers. Thanks!

Baba wrote:
Hello. Here's my take on this matter of metta or loving kindness. Actually, I will narrate a simple practice to accompany my point.


1. First, sit down in a good relaxed posture. Close your eyes. Take a few deeper breaths if you feel like it. Then let the breath be on it's own. Scan the inside of the physical body. Be alert to notice any tentions. As you notice tensions, allow them to be released. When a tension releases, what is found from the place of the released tension? Look carefully to find that out... What you find is open space. Good. Continue releasing other tensions by going through the whole body space. No hurry, do it carefully with time and everytime a tension is released notice that open space in the place of the former tension. As you keep doing this for a couple of minutes the small areas of open space begins to feel like one unified field of open space that is both in and out of the physical body. Check if this is so. Make notice of this and marinate in that space. Rest in that with time with some sharpness of mind so that you don't become drowsy or distracted.

2. Now. See if the open space both within and without your physical body is alive. Is it? Does it seem to be alive? Living? As you notice this aliveness of the wide open space within you, see if there is anyone there or is the "me" absent. As the point of this study is not on selfless nature of the mind, I will go on to loving kindness. So, the inner space is wide open, free, alive and there is no me found there. Check yourself. Now, see if that aliveness quality is also kind. Is it? And is it also loving? Compassionate? Personally I have found that this awake awareness has all those qualities and yet is without self. In fact, if there is self concerned with this love, kindness and compassion, it becomes artificially flavored.

So there. Based on this experiment we can understand that we don't need to cultivate loving kindness or do some spwcial tricks as it is already right there within and without us. Just relax, recognise the open space and focus on the aliveness of it, instead of it knowing itself or the stillness of it or the clarity of it. Having said all this, I have to say that doing this exercise requires some ability to relax and focus at the same time. However, it is a very direct practice based on principles without any technical or ritual factors, so it can also have significant effects. Hope this helps.

KL wrote: This really, really helped me. Somehow it made me remember that I discovered the alive nature of space when I was a child. Thank you so much for reminding me. How could I have forgotten? How could I have been practicing so long without noticing it?!?! 

Baba wrote: Yup, that's the mother of all healers. You're welcome. May your traumas be washed away completely.

- Baba Kim Katami, 
18.1.2016.

Open Heart, www.openheart.fi

Stages of Spiritual Attainment / Open Heart Bhumi Model

Stages of Spiritual Attainment/
Open Heart Bhumi Model



Purpose

Two common problems of spiritual practice are that 1. a practitioner doesn't know where he or she is at in terms of attainments relating to the final goal of full buddhahood and 2. there has been no universally applicable method in finding out exactly the level of attainment of teachers. Both of these factors cause ignorance and confusion. It would be very helpful if we could answer both of these questions with certainty. The Open Heart Bhumi Model, as presented here and in the Bhumi Study Series, offers a way to answer these questions.   


I am happy to present this system of mapping spiritual attainments and offer it to everyone. With the skills of mindfulness and clear perception, it is possible to be learned by anyone and is applicable to anyone regardless of spiritual orientation. When applying the Open Heart Bhumi Model (OHBM) it doesn't matter which tradition, teacher, master or practitioner is concerned. This bhumi model transcends the conceptual and terminological differences of traditions, and often hard to understand descriptions of stages without in-depth study of that particular tradition. Although terms and descriptions are also useful and necessary, this bhumi mapping system gives a different spin on the issue because it is not based on words and verbal descriptions. Rather, it is based on distinct observation of energy and awareness of the recipient performed by someone who has learned the system. The OHBM is a way to know whereone is at or where someone else might be in regards to his or her spiritual attainment. The Open Heart Bhumi Model is a great step towards a more complete presentation of pragmatic dharma. 


The Open Heart Bhumi Model is based on the energy system of man, and for this reason is universal. Without studying it, it will make a little sense, if any. That being said once one begins to study it systematically observing oneself, empirically meditating (visiting) one's own bhumis and observing bhumis in others, it starts to make sense. This has been seen with people who are learning it. And yet, it might take many years of regular study to become an expert in bhumi analysis. 


The Origin of the Open Heart Bhumi Model


I first learned the bhumi model in early 2014 from a mahasiddha called Thirumular, with whom I studied for several years. After continuing my studies with Machig Labdron, Padmasambhava and others, the same model has served well in mapping various shifts of my own and of others.

Visiting, opening and perfecting bhumis 

The OHBM contains 13 bhumis. The first 10 of those are related to the samsaric mind (tib. sem) that stores karmic traces and the highest three are related to one's own innate buddhahood, three different levels of them. Bhumis, literally "grounds", are vibratory fields of our mind and awareness (tib. sem nyid). These grounds are directly connected to our subtle body, or body of energy that is often called "mind" (tib. sem). Bhumi centers are stacked in each other like a stack of 13 plates. 

Every human being has the same energy body, the same structure of centers (skt. chakra) and channels (skt. nadi). For this reason anyone with enough skills in mindfulness and instructions can visit one's own bhumis. Visiting or emulating bhumis means that one consciously enters a certain vibratory rate relating to a certain subtle center which then affects the whole energy system or in other words, one's mind. All bhumis can be visited.

Opening of bhumis means that one or several of the "bhumi plates" become punctured. The difference between visiting and opening a bhumi is that when a bhumi opens up it has a permanent effect on one's mind while a visit only has a temporary effect. Opening of a bhumi can be a small crack, a small hole or a big hole in the bhumi center. Depending on how big the hole is, is why awakening experiences are more or less dramatic leaps. Having said that even a small crack will make a notable difference on one's being. It is important to understand that while regular spiritual practice has an effect on the mind, bhumis do not open if the 1st bhumi is not open. For this reason opening of the first bhumi (awakening, seeing to one's true nature) is very important.
Opening of a bhumi, on the other hand, does not mean that one would perfect it.

Perfection of a bhumi means that all karmic records stored in the subtle centers and channels connected to a particular bhumi, become released (dzogchen) or transformed (tantra). Here, the particular bhumi plate disappears and no longer causes any kind of energetic sensations, from negative to positive mind states. Perfection of the whole karmically related bhumi system (bhumis 1-10) would indicate full nullification of dualistic mind (all karmas and samskaras) and the attainment of the first stage of buddhahood (tib. trekcho, cutting through), relating to the 11th bhumi, also called the 1st mahasiddha bhumi. At this point one will no longer have any impulsive energetic (mental, emotional or very subtle/ alaya vijnana) occurrences at any time of the day or night. In traditional terms at this stage one has become a nirmanakaya buddha, buddha in human form by attaining or realising the dharmakaya, or ultimate nature of mind. 

The next stage from here is to attain 12th and 13th bhumis, or 2nd and 3rd mahasiddha bhumis by the means of leap-over or jump-over (tib. thogal, thögal). The leap-over means that the former attainment of nirmanakaya buddhahood is taken or expanded to the energy body and it's basic elements. When this has been partially attained, it relates to the small rainbow body which can be observed at the time of death by various mystical occurrences such as visible rainbow coloured lights and emanating of mantric sounds, as well as through extensive shrinking of the physical corpse. 
If the leap-over is fully attained it relates to the perfection of the 13th bhumi, or 3rd mahasiddha bhumi and the attainment of the full rainbow body (tib. jalus, jalu phowa chenpo, འཇའ་ལུས་) when mystical occurrences also take place but no physical corpse remains except hair and nails. Here one has leaped from being a nirmanakaya buddha to being a sambhogakaya buddha, or a buddha with the perfection of the energy body of basic elements.

See also this video for explanation.


Stages of spiritual attainment


1. Awakening, opening of the 1st bhumi. Awakening is also called by terms such as (jap.) kensho, or stream-entry (p. sotapanna). Related to the subject-self.
2. Mind purification, opening and perfecting of bhumis 2-6-10. Related to the numerous object-selves.
3. Bodhisattva bhumis, bhumis 7-10. Four bhumis specifically related to the substrate consciousness (skt. alaya vijnana, tib. kun gzhi)
4. Mahasiddha bhumis, opening and perfecting of bhumis 11-13. Three stages of buddhahood.


1. Awakening. Awakening has been extensively covered and described in materials offered by Open Heart. Refer to the website for more www.openheart.fi. When observed energetically, awakening, or insight of selflessness caused by perceiving "me" or "I" as an illusion, takes place at the location behind one's eyes inside the head. When the illusion of "me" as an independent separate entity drops off, this location opens up energetically and the eyes get a natural, relaxed and bright look to them, especially immediately after the opening. Post-awakening this bhumi center location is open and will not close again but may become blurry when strong emotions (object-selves) arise from the subconscious mind and create momentary selfing.


2. Mind purification. After the first bhumi has been opened, one's subsequent practice causes further mind purification which relates to opening of the following bhumis. The bhumi centers inside the head (2-6), stacked on top of each other, relate to the energy body inside the physical body and particularly to the centers in the four limbs. Bhumi centers 2-6 open up with the purification or transformation of these centers. This can be called "growing in the insight of
emptiness". Each opening has an effect both on one's meditation as well as daily living.  

With the opening of the 6th bhumi, one's mind becomes significantly clearer than before, although there is a lot to go in opening the following bhumis and perfecting of them all. Opening of the 6th bhumi makes a great difference for the person him- or herself. However, at times one's mind can get very clouded. 

As a general note, opening of the 6th bhumi is quite rare among all schools of buddhism and otherwise. In sects where practitioners manage to open their 1st bhumi, they usually progress a few more bhumi openings but then hit a wall. There are exceptions to this but in general, few are able to open the 6th bhumi. This means that practitioners and teachers of this stage or lower still have a lot of karmic knots in their energy bodies, translating to dualistic illusion in their mind, seen in how they act, what and how they teach and how they carry themselves.


3. Bodhisattva bhumis, four stages. The first four centers above the crown, are related to bhumis 7-10 and are called "bodhisattva bhumis". Openings of these makes one's mind clearer and clearer while at the same time one's practice and meditation stirs up stuff deeper from the subconscious mind and substrate consicousness (which are two slightly different things). Here one mainly works with apparent or subtle forms of dullness and paralysis caused by the substrace consciousness (alaya vijnana, kun gzhi). The difference of awareness (rigpa) and substrate is something that the dzogchen masters underline. After the opening of the 6th bhumi and further openings, one can easily mistake substrate for awareness. This is fairly common. The difference of the two becomes very clear with the opening of the 1st mahasiddha bhumi (11th). 


Generally very few traditions produce practitioners who proceed to bhumis higher than the 6th but fortunately some do. Tantric buddhism (vajrayana) and dzogchen are the strongest in this sense. High lamas of various lineages are usually on bodhisattva bhumis (7th-10th) trying to perfect them.

4. Mahasiddha bhumis, three stages. With the opening of the 11th bhumi, awareness (tib. rigpa) becomes pronounced even though the previous bhumis aren't yet perfected and mind impulses still occasionally happen. When the 11th and the following mahasiddha bhumis open up, awareness is one's default mode. It is clear, lucid, vastly open and unobstructed most of the time. This clarity and openness simply is there, there is no need to seek or enhance it. The opening of the first mahasiddha bhumi is a game changer as it puts one's practice and living in a different light. The relationship of mindfulness and awareness can be realised. This opening also helps one to see why dzogchen or Great Perfection is the king of all buddhist vehicles. 


Pure Land Jhanas 

In Open Heart we have the so called 13 Pure Land Jhanas and their concerned buddhas for distinquishing whether one has perfected bhumis. For more information see our website.


Open Heart Bhumi Model and the Energy System



Video documentations

Here is a documentation of videos of my own and those of Open Heart-practitioners, bhumi openings and mind purification since 2/2013 starting about one year after the initial awakening (1st bhumi). You can observe a notable change between videos which is caused by bhumi openings. In my case the progress was caused by Tibetan Heart Yoga, tantric Guru Yoga and Dzogchen Atiyoga. Observe carefully.

Click here for Kim's Bhumi Videos and Documentation.
Click here for Open Heart Bhumi Videos.



Bhumi Study Series

Bhumi Study Series, Part 1: Before and after awakening, and 2nd-5th bhumis

Bhumi Study Series, Part 2: 6th bhumis with notes
Bhumi Study Series, Part 3: 7th bhumis
Bhumi Study Series, Part 4: 8th bhumis
Bhumi Study Series, Part 5: 9th bhumis  
Bhumi Study Series, Part 6: 10th bhumis
Bhumi Study Series, Part 7: 11th bhumis 
Bhumi Study Series, Part 8: 12th bhumis
Bhumi Study Series, Part 9: 13th bhumis  
Bhumi Study Series, Part 10: From Zero to Mahasiddha Bhumis
Extra: How to do Bhumi Mapping



Thank you,
Kim Katami


Open Heart, 

www.openheart.fi