keskiviikko 27. toukokuuta 2020

My Experience of Garab Dorje's Three Vital Points by Ugi Muller

My Experience of Garab Dorje's
Three Vital Points

by Ugi Muller


My experience and understanding of a fruitful teacher-student relationship displayed in regards to Garab Dorje's three vital points:

Point 1: »Introducing directly the face of rigpa itself.«

This is the part of the teacher (besides the necessary readiness of the student). The main job of the teacher is to introduce the student to the experiental recognition of the nature of mind. All the teacher does, is either a preparation for this (if individually necessary) or the actual pointing-out in whatever most effective way he knows of at the time.

As I see it, a lot of teachers today are either unable or unwilling to really follow up on their job. To not bullshit around, for the sake of tradition or whatever, but to really provide what they're here to provide: pointing out the nature of mind. To do whatever they can do to make that happen with students who are ready for it.

Pointing-out instructions or direct transmissions are regarded as something very rare and special by so many students and teachers. Of course they are. But in Vajrayana, this rarity IS the daily business - or should be. Buddhahood in this life-time. It's the goal, not a myth. And you train exactly in that, not in whorshipping it …

Garab Dorje


Point 2: »Deciding upon one thing and one thing only.«

This is the part of the student. The teacher cannot take this decision for the student. Not even Guru Rinpoche can. The student has to trust the introduction he received to decide on it again and again and again (practice). In good and in bad times. This way he gains certainty. The teacher cannot provide certainty until the student is ready to decide to be certain.

Of course, the precondition is the fullfillment of point Nr. 1. However, there are so many students who believe that the teacher has all the answers and power, and that they should ask him/her about everything. They don't really start putting things into practice because they don't dare to decide that they can do it. This move is entirely up to the student.

Trusting the liberating authority of the teacher only works if you recognise your own authority. They have to come together. Or else, it's just worship and cultish followership. The student has to acknowledge and fullfill his part of the "deal". The teacher is not here to be worshiped or to be put on a pedestal. He/she is here to help you switch the light on. He can show you where the switch is but you have to pull it.

Point 3: »Confidence directly in the liberation of rising thoughts.«

That's the actual practice that blasts all samsaric clinging. It starts to happen when point 1 and 2 are achieved. Of course, one still may have questions about certain obstacles or aspects of the practice and here the teacher is the one to turn to. However, only when an actual teacher-student relationship has been established. The teacher points to the way again and the student decides to follow up on that, trusting the teacher by trusting himself (and vice versa).

Looking at the state of modern day Vajrayana, I've been immeasurably fortunate to have found Pemako and to be able to experience the fruits of such an actual teacher-student relationship. Deep bow to Kim Rinpoche, Guru Padmasambhava and the Pemako Sangha.

I don't claim absolute truth with this little elaboration of mine here but I trust that it might be useful or interesting for some :)

May all beings be free!
 
-Ugi Muller, practitioner of Pemako Buddhism
5/2020

perjantai 15. toukokuuta 2020

Spiritual Carnivores - Buddhist Ex-Vegetarians Describe Their Experiences With Vegetarian and Non-Vegetarian Diets

Spiritual Carnivores

Buddhist Ex-Vegetarians Describe Their Experiences
With Vegetarian and Non-Vegetarian Diets


Kim's Account


I was a vegetarian for 15 years, until the age of 40. I became a vegetarian after being introduced to buddhism and yogic practice because it seemed like that was one of the things I was supposed to do. Back then it made sense to me that eating meat means killing animals which directly breaks the basic buddhist precept of nonharming. Now, I see that this kind of thinking is onesided but for several years vegetarian, or to be exact, dairy-egg-vegetarian diet worked fine for me. On the other hand, these years were ”easy” for me as I didn't have a lot of responsibilities.

I always ate a balanced diet of vegetarian food. However, for a period of 7-8 years at the end of my 15 years as a vegetarian, my life got really hard and stressful. I was badly burnt out for 3½ years, we had two children with my ex-wife, I had to work overtime every day and I was the one who had to earn enough money to pay the bills. During this time, which also coincided with metabolical change that comes around the age of 30, I had to eat big heaps of vegetarian food to meet the demand of energy but already an hour later, I was hungry. Veg food just didn't have the nutrition and energy my body needed so I was hungry most of the time. I was also going to the toilet 2-5 times a day. It just came through without providing sustaining energy. I got so much carbohydrates from grains (bread and pasta) that I gained a lot of weight. At the end of my vegetarian days (in 2019), I weighed 115 kilograms which is way too much for someone my height (173 cm).

By 2019 I was completely fed up having to eat so big portions while being hungry all the time, while getting fatter and fatter. I had taken iron supplements for 2-3 months that helped a bit but made not big enough difference. It was at this point when my good friend Lama Karl, who himself had suffered of constant tiredness and hungryness, told me that his problems stopped by eating meat. I was also aware of Dr Jordan Peterson's and his daughter's amazing accounts in favour of carnivore diet.

I started eating meat in July 2019. From my first burger, my energy levels went up to make me feel normal. I felt very natural, grounded, clear minded and well, and was surprised when I didn't need to eat but a third of the meal size I did before. I didn't feel constantly hungry anymore and I could, if necessary, stretch the interval between meals up to 7-8 hours. That was revolutionary! Meat was precisely what my body had needed for many years but my unquestioned religious ideas kept me from even considering eating meat.

I admit that in the beginning eating meat was a bit like the second challenge of Fear Factor where the contestants compete on eating gross things. But then I developed appreciation about the fact that a being, such as a lamb, pig or a cow had given their lives for me to get proper nutrition. I didn't (and don't) take that lightly.

Ever since my first meal of meat I have prayed for the animal or animals that have given their bodies. I always ask Buddha Amitabha's blessings for them and all production animals around the world. Everytime I do that I perceive that blessings reach these spirits and change their presence and future. Because I am a practicing tantric yogi, eating their meat is a great blessing that directly affects them. When it gets personal, me eating their flesh, the outcome of the prayer becomes much more powerful than if I just prayed for any or all animals without personal connection.

I believe it is for these both reasons, 1. proper nutrition for a layman with work and many responsibilities and 2. directly helping animals who are on the lower spokes of the realms of existence according to buddhist theory, that tantrics of history have typically eaten meat. Like some other things in buddhism, I think that vegetarian diet is something that the monastic establishment pushed into buddhism and by doing so made an idealistic disservice for those, who require more energy than monastics do.

Writing this, I am 41 years old. I eat meat on all meals and have never felt better. To finish my account I would like to share simple instructions about how to pray for the dead animals.

  • If you make your meal yourself, you can chant a mantra of your choosing for the animal while preparing the meal.

  • When you have the plate in front of you, look at the meat and try to sense a connection with the animal spirit who inhabited the meat before. Then in your mind or aloud, chant the mantra of Amitabha Buddha at least three times,
    Namo Amitabha, Namo Amitabha, Namo Amitabha”

  • You can do more than three but three repetitions is enough and gets the job done. Chanting of the mantra brings in or reveals Amitabha Buddha in your mind. This energy is then automatically projected through the meat into the animal spirit, and because of this, if you have the sensitivity, you can directly see or sense how Buddha Amitabha's blessing changes the whole karmic destiny of the animal. Now you have done a dharmic deed that greatly helps the animals and blessed your food.

Thank you for reading. May all beings be free,

Kim Rinpoche, 15.5.2020


Rorik's Account


My good friend Kim Katami has asked me to write a little piece about my journey to an ancestral diet . . . eating meat. I’ve never met Kim in person, but I have a strong feeling of kinship with him; we are very similar people, and I admire his work in presenting a practical Dharma system for Westerners.

Like Kim, I was a vegetarian for the better part of 15 years because of spiritual motivations, and the guidance of many great teachers, and most recently was a vegan for 3 years. Being a vegan simply destroyed me. You could say that the 3 years of veganism quickly finished off what few reserves I had left from the slow starvation of vegetarianism. I didn’t know it at the time, but 100% plant-based diets are worse than total deprivation of nutrients for people of my genetic heritage; I know this because I have found fasting to be very healing. I bought into all the happy feel-good propaganda of the Vegan SJWs and their Marxist vision of a world without suffering, where every animal is worshipped and divine, and humans are the monsters.

As a vegetarian I noticed that I tired more easily, and that I was always tired to some degree; low in energy, and placid in mind; the sort of placidness that tends to mental laziness rather than alert vigilance. This developed into chronic fatigue after some years. The first 6 – 8 months of 100% plant-based diet was relatively good; I got some positive results with weight loss, and a temporary boost of energy, but a year later the weight began to come back, the energy levels plummeted, and I began to have other problems such as sleep apnea and fibromyalgia, with high levels of joint and muscle pain. I also felt very smug in my new peak of ethical behaviour; oddly enough, I did not then draw a connection between my diet, and the flood of new health problems coming to me, or the constant mental fog.

Let’s be clear about mental fog . . . it is a physical condition caused by systemic inflammation and the deprivations of fatty acids, contributed heavily to by a gut-biome that is very unhealthy. It is also known as depression. Vegans have one thing in common across the world: more than half of long-term vegans have clinical depression and anxiety.

Some will question whether I did veganism properly. The answer to that is that I have a couple years of university level nutritional education, and that I have eaten what is commonly understood to be an almost ideal diet for most of my life. As far as veganism goes, I did everything right; I took supplements, ate nutrient dense foods, stayed away from the vegan faux-meat/cheese products, and took in plenty of greens, and whole vegetables in large variety. I had an ideal vegan diet, and had great discipline in maintaining it. None of this protected me from the consequences of veganism.

Earlier in my life, in periods that I was not fully vegetarian (but held it as the ideal to be attained) I noticed that whenever I consumed a large medium-rare steak, that for the next few days I would have more energy and zest for life. At the time I simply did not understand why this would be so. For me, my departure from veganism coincided with my discovery of the Marxist takeover of animal rights groups and the major Vegan movements. When I saw through all their propaganda and coercion, along with all the collusion and corruption coming from big Agra, I was fairly furious. It was then that I began to examine the facts about environmentalism and a traditional farming model. I quickly realized that almost nothing cited by the prominent voices of environmentalism and a plant-based diet were true. Sure, big factory farming meat production is horrendous and not as healthy as it could be, but even at that . . . meat from these sources is still far healthier for you than eating an Impossible Burger/Beyond Meat, or any of the other highly processed manufactured protein meat-imitations. I made a decision to put animal-based foods back into my diet. At this point a lot of things started to get better slowly. But then I began to pay attention to various voices talking about the ancestral diet, and why one simply cannot go against thousands of years of specific regional evolution.

Our ancestors ate specific foods that worked for their region and weather patterns for tens of thousands of years, and one person coming from a genetic stream is not going to change that in just 50 years of their life. One is literally trying to swim up a water fall, if you will. I would go so far to say that if you have a significant amount of genetic heritage from Northern Europe or Asia, you simply cannot be healthy without meat. During one of my elimination diets, used to determine food reactions, I found that I could handle butter, and cheese from Europe (but not North American cheese). This was odd. Why no cheese or milk from North America? (I can get into that later if anyone wants to know.) I found out that I could not tolerate any processed vegetable oils. I discovered that bread, pasta, or anything produced from wheat was completely intolerable. I found out that all processed sugar is slow suicide; and in the end I discovered that virtually any packaged (frozen, canned, in a box, or pre-prepared) food was uneatable. This brought me to an anti-inflammatory diet, composed of just whole, fresh prepared food from a limited list of options. At this point I was feeling much better, and I knew I was on to something great. Then I discovered that the more meat I ate, and the less vegetables, the better I felt . . . more energy, better mood, sharper mind, more strength, etc. Here is where I began to seriously listen to proponents of the ancestral diet, those who advocated for a keto-genic diet, and the carnivore advocates. I have adopted most of their guidelines. Now I eat mostly meat (beef, lamb, some pork, foul, and fatty fish) with some fermented vegetables and small amounts of well-cooked greens. During periods of several days when I eat nothing but meat I notice a big difference. Why is this true? I have no doubt that it is because this is the way my ancestors ate for eons of time. Humans were never plant-based eaters.

Humans evolved into what we are because they began to eat large amounts of animal fat; our brains evolved to have higher functions, and developed greater size and capacity because of heavy protein and fat intake. Humans are naturally carnivores, who in some scenarios developed the capacity to ingest limited amounts of plants as a survival strategy (for when wild game was scarce). For most of us Europeans and Asians, we have a surprising amount of Neanderthal genes, along with some Denisovan, and Homo Heidelbergensus genes (otherwise called “an unknown species”). All of these ancient ancestors were exclusively carnivores. One does not go against nature and win. Genetic science and paleo-anthropology trumps ideas held to be sacred. There may be people in the world who can be on 100% plant-based diet for many years and appear to do well, but most of us cannot. Vegans say you can survive on a plant-based diet, and that may be true for a period of time, but you cannot thrive on it. This does not even figure in all the chronic health problems that arise from nutrient deprivation, or the major diseases that can precipitate from inflammation and a glucose burning metabolism. Human metabolism is naturally a fat-burning metabolism, but we have developed the ability to shift to glucose burning, for survival during times of scarcity. Even at that, being in glucose burning metabolism is less than ideal, and is not conducive to exuberant vitality and long-term health.

Today, with the modern industrialised diet, systemic inflammation has become the root of all modern diseases. Some call it the S.A.D. (standard American diet) but the truth is that this is endemic to all modern industrialised nations. Most packaged foods have enormous amounts of refined sugar, unhealthy salt, and ridiculous amounts of processed vegetable oils. This appeals to human instinct because we are genetically programmed to go after nutrient rich food, with high fat and salt. Salt was often scarce in ancient diets, so much so that salt was as valuable a precious metals. Fruits, berries, and honey were seasonal treats, so sweet foods were coveted. This hunger for fat, salt, and sweet is the formula for all junk food; only now food is being produced using refined sugar and highly processed vegetable oil. Both are highly inflammatory to the body and generate disease. Now here is the conundrum: if you eliminate all processed foods, and eat only whole fresh foods that are seasonal and regional, what do you have left to eat that will build health, and heal illnesses? The answer is meat, and butter fat. Meat heals; butter and fat heals. Our bodies and especially our brains and nervous system craves high quality fat. Meat and animal fat is the only super-food there is. This presents a dilemma for someone who believes that abstaining from meat is required to live an ethical life in harmony with standard Dharma teachings, to attain enlightenment.

How did I reconcile the spiritual dimension of food, with the fact that my body requires animal fat? My reasoning may not satisfy the rigour of some people’s expectations or demands. I can only honestly present how I understand and approach it. First, it is a given for me that science trumps religious claims (yes, veganism is a religious cult). The facts of genetics and paleoanthropology are clear that up till the dawn of specialised agriculture (9,000 years ago) and the early appearance of cities, humans were dominantly carnivore; especially the human races who lived closer to the Arctic Circle, i.e. my ancestors. The genetic group that my body hails from were Mammoth hunters, and then moved on to auroch herd predation. Just at the beginning of the end of the Ice Age some of them moved north, and over the next 8,000 to 10,000 years became the people that we are now. This is where my genetic heritage comes from . . . from hundreds of thousands of years of eating mostly meat, probably with seasonal berries, some herbs and small amounts of non-cultivated fruit, some honey occasionally, and . . . 8 to 9 months every year with preserved and fresh meat during the long cold winters.

This is the body I was born with; it requires meat to be healthy and vital. A plant-based diet has proven to me that it does not work. It produces fatigue, low energy, joint and soft-tissue pain, low mood, and depression with anxiety. Proper meat intake healed those problems. As long as I eat plenty of fatty meat and offal (nose to tail), fatty fish, eggs and lots of butter, I have energy, I don’t get tired, depression fades away, and I have the mental clarity and sense of well-being to function as a normal human being. My meat based diet has also healed other serious chronic diseases that I’m not specifying, but could talk about later. My noetic practices (meditation) are richly benefitted, as I don’t automatically descend into a lethargic state of mind that I have to fight to rise above. The mental clarity and quality of awareness shining through my synapses now is brilliant!

From a Dharma point of view, is it immoral or unethical for a tiger to eat only meat? No. A tiger is designed to eat the deer and gazelles. I was designed to also eat like a tiger. The wolf is the same. Interestingly, by categorisation humans fit the definition of a cursorial predator; with our eyes set forward (like wolves and large cats), and our capacity to run prey down – our ancestors used to hunt just like wolves, running the animals in large circles, tag teaming them until the prey was exhausted and then taking the game. Our so-called closest cousins by genetics, the chimpanzees and bonobos also hunt, and require meat, and they hunt in teams just like we used to.

I recognise that my body is a part of Samsara, that it is an integral aspect of the endless cycle of relativity, that has arisen through dependent origination, and that its nature is not changeable to a more ideal standard set by beliefs. It is what it is. I also recognise that the samsaric nature of suffering is not effected by anything that we do, no matter how ethical or pure we think it may be. We can only eradicate the sources of suffering in ourselves, and act with the hope that we can aid other suffering intelligent beings who have made themselves receptive to our aspirations.

Being a part of the cycle of nature, I understand that the animal’s body is given to me for sustenance, because that is its purpose. Its death is not in vain, or meaningless, or even a tragedy, but fulfils its own dharma, or reason for being. If we understand the cycle of life and nature, accept it as it is, if we honour and value the animals we eat, if we give thanks for their lives, appreciate the depth of the cycle of nature, and pray for their liberation, there is no moral or ethical issue at all. The sin/error is in being mindless consumers devoid of any thoughts about the ethical, and with no regard to optimising our bodily health. People who follow the ancestral diet contribute positively to the health and balance of the planet’s ecology, and diversity of species in ecosystems. Ruminates prevent soil-erosion, contribute to diversity of species in their ecosystem, and restore land to health – they even effect weather patterns positively.

For all the SJW types out there who will be outraged by what I have said, there are only a few solutions that will work to heal the earth from the devastation of the industrial revolution, and mass consumerism: 1) encouraging grass-fed, free-range ruminates for food; 2) a massive campaign to plant trees of all differing species across the earth, and planting industrial hemp in the arid regions; 3) and the intelligent and compassionate decision to bring human populations down to manageable levels, to live in perfect harmony with our ecosphere – not by systematically destroying ourselves with an unnatural diet of just plants.

The irony of veganism is that it is only highly privileged first-world people who can meet their ideal of an animal free diet, and most of them do it by filling their guts with faux foods made with intensive industrial processes (anything but natural). Their primary sources of food such a beans, rice, and soy products are derived from industrial agricultural operations that are highly destructive to the environment. They fill their stomachs with exotic fruit and vegetables that do not grow where they live, but have to be transported by aeroplane. The greatest destruction is from the sugar and oil industries. But the person who eats close to the land, produces his own food, and raises his own beef, pork, lamb, and foul is actually helping to regenerate the environment. I think at this point that the most ethical and positive thing we can do for the world is to embrace our true biological nature and requirements, and to eat what our bodies are meant to eat, and insist that our food comes from grass-fed ethically farmed sources.

Finally, years ago, I remember one Buddhist teacher saying in response to a question about eating meat, that these animals we eat, came into the world with this purpose, and that they fulfil their dharma by giving their lives for us, and thus move toward liberation. I agree. There is no ethical problem at all . . . unless we fail to appreciate this, and offer thanks and gratitude. The stories about high Lamas and Rinpoches having a special fondness for double-cheese burgers, and washing them down with vodka comes to mind. Many of them publically teach the necessity of a vegetarian life for serious practitioners, but in private life they don’t believe it at all. It’s no wonder . . . Tibetans for tens of thousands of years have depended on a diet composed mostly of yak meat and butter. There’s not much that can grow in Tibet besides a few herbs and animals. One cannot go against nature and win. Even Guru Rinpoche had no compunction about eating meat, drinking wine, and . . . a few other practices we “moral” people consider as vices. Did this negatively affect his outstanding achievement, and the attaining of the Rainbow Body? No. Case closed.


Matt's Account


Matt: I'm half-Finnish and was vegetarian for ~2.5 years total due to my Buddhist practice. I no longer wanted to eat factory-farmed animals, which are raised in conditions of extreme cruelty, or even any living thing that had been killed for meat. I was careful to get enough protein and other nutrients. During my vegetarian phases, I generally gained weight, felt bloated & slightly nauseous, and was never completely full or satiated no matter how much or what types of vegetables I ate. These symptoms would disappear as soon as I ate meat. I have greater mental clarity when eating meat as well. I finally came to the conclusion that I’m constitutionally best suited to an omnivorous diet. It was easier to accept this knowing that the Dalai Lama is apparently the same way--he had health problems that only abated when he stopped practicing vegetarianism. I primarily eat meat and vegetables with no starches and few carbohydrates in general. I also incorporate long periods of fasting (with appropriate electrolyte supplementation). This diet has produced the best mental and physical health for me overall.


Lucy's Account


I'm glad this has been raised. I don't think all vegetarians suffer from low energy. Some people are suited to it but I wasn't.   My daughter and her partner are vegans and persuaded me that eating meat was unethical. I also went off the texture of meat and felt giving it up was the right decision at the time.  

I only did it for a year and got severe anaemia. I lived on iron tablets and extra spinach and kale, all the while having mad cravings for red meat, usually steak. I even dreamt about eating red meat, steak pies covered in gravy, or oxtail stews where the meat falls of the bone.  Much to my disgust, at the time.

I had brain fog and just limped through that year. I was tired all the time and put it down to age. On my days off I could sleep in and still nap again in the afternoon then sleep through the night. I thought my days of high energy levels were over. I went to stay with Lama Karl at the sangha house in Birmingham.  The smell of pork chops grilling made me salivate and cravings for meat were at an all time high.  I'm certain my body knew what it was lacking, just as it did when I was pregnant.  I would crave certain food types that my body required and reject others.

Once I made the decision to eat meat again, a few weeks later, my energy levels rose really quickly. I wasn't tired all the time. Consequently my skin improved. I no longer had dark shadows around my eyes.  The ideal diet for me includes meat, fish, vegetables and full fat dairy. My digestive system is at it's best then. 

Carbohydrates also have a negative impact on my body, although I still eat them.  I try to listen to my body though. I was sick for a year.


Karl's Account


By Lama Karl Eikrem: I have been interested in spirituality, meditation and yoga for about a decade. For most of that time I have also believed that there was something “unspiritual” about the practice of eating meat. Looking at the spiritual scene with its widespread focus on plant-based diets and black and white interpretations of the principle of non-harm, this isn’t very shocking. Thus for the past decade I have periodically avoided eating meat, and during the periods I have eaten meat for various reasons, the idea that it was “bad” somehow kept lingering in the back of my mind ultimately directing me back to the kingdom of plants.
In fact, the idea seemed so to me so integral to spiritual practice that I would probably never have questioned its validity if it hadn’t been for the fact I am a long time sufferer of various chronic health problems. These problems include digestive issues, more specifically IBS, as well as systemic inflammation of the body manifesting most notably as an array of skin problems. 
 
I have always believed these problems to be related to diet somehow, and therefore I have experimented with many different ways of eating throughout the years. Diets I have experimented with range from high-meat/low carb, such as the Paleo diet, to fruit-based raw veganism. Because of this experimentation with a wide selection of diets, I have gained a pretty good picture of what works for my body and not. Nevertheless, I must admit that despite my personal knowledge, the ideology of the “spiritual” plant-based diets skewed my thinking for years, leading me to go back to diets I knew were not optimal for me. 
 
In fact, it was quite early on in my experimentation that I realised the benefit of a high meat diet. Regardless, it took me years and years of going back and forth between eating meat and not eating meat until I simply had had enough and started trusting my own experience. 
 
I remember driving back from the Pemako Buddhist Spring Retreat of 2019, dealing with severe bloating and stomach pain, as well as badly inflamed skin, having eating the high-carb vegetarian diet that was the standard for our retreats back then (ironically I was the cook!). It was then, in the midst of my physical pain, that my teacher casually mentioned something about tantric practitioners always having eaten meat. 
 
Now, a few weeks prior to this I had come across a particular diet called The Gut and Psychology Diet (GAPS), which had seemed promising in dealing with my particular ailments. The only problem was of course that it was highly meat-based, including very little plant foods at all. Nevertheless, when I heard my teachers comment something clicked in my mind and I said to myself: “Fuck it! I am done with this veggie bullshit!” 
 
So when I got back I started the diet. Now, the GAPS diet is an elimination type diet where you eliminate all foods but bone broth, meat and maybe one or two vegetables for up to a week. Then over a longer period you introduce more and more foods like eggs, fermented dairy, some veggies and fruits until you have a relatively normal diet that is high in nutrient dense ingredients that are supposed to be healing for the gut. 
 
The reason I mention that is that during the first few weeks of primarily eating bone broth soups with meat and a perhaps a carrot or squash, I saw major improvements. This was especially the case with my digestion but also to a certain degree regarding the skin problems. However, interestingly enough, as soon as I started introducing more plant foods into my diet my problems started flaring up again. It was then that I started wondering whether perhaps plant foods were a major contributor to my worsening health. 
 
Subsequently, I went full carnivore, eating a diet consisting only of meat, fish and eggs, salt and water. What happened after I made the switch was way beyond my expectations. Not only did my IBS completely go away within a week, but my skin healed fully as well. No more itchy eczema on the face, no more dandruff, no more weird red dots on my forehead. 
 
Furthermore, after a few more weeks a whole array of problems that I didn’t even know I had started lifting. My frequent headaches, my bad breath, flaky skin on hands and feet, the body odour, all went away within a month. Even my mood swings balanced out and my energy levels improved. When working out I felt like I had an extra gear that I hadn’t previously been aware of and my body’s ability to deal with lactic acid build-up improved greatly. In short I felt great for the 4-5 months were I strictly ate animal products only. 
 
Importantly, I saw absolutely no adverse effects on my meditation practice from eating meat. On the contrary, the positive effects it had on my body and mind actually made me better able to practice due to having more energy and a clearer mind. 
 
Unfortunately, because I travel a lot and because I am not the most disciplined person in the world, I eventually started cheating here and there, eating “normal food” at restaurants etc. This would always lead me into a spiral of eating more and more carbohydrates as they are highly addictive by nature. Interestingly, what happened whenever I did this was that my symptoms come back right away. On the bright side, as long as I eat enough meat, it doesn’t get as bad as it used to be, but nevertheless, the carbohydrates and plants in general seem to affect me very negatively and I always start healing again when eating animal foods only. 
 
In short, over the past year it has become obvious to me that “spiritual” vegetarianism/veganism is little more than ideology. Unexamined beliefs passed on from one person to another, spreading like a virus. And while I have nothing against people who eat in this way or that way, I believe it is highly problematic when certain diets are presented as being more in accordance with spirituality than others. To me, such notions are nothing but religious fundamentalism and, as such, quite contrary to authentic spirituality. Thank you.


perjantai 20. maaliskuuta 2020

Sailing the Seas of Samsara

Sailing the Seas of Samsara

Hi all!

I hope you're all doing fine and practicing well during this time of global hardship. Coronavirus has taken us all by surprise but really there is nothing new in it as a samsaric occurrence. It is good time to contemplate transitoriness of life and to re-kindle our motivation for mahayana buddhist practice. Hardships like this can be great catalysators for dharma practice because when samsara becomes concrete, veils of illusion drop like drops of water from ducks feathers. The good in hardship like this is that our lazyness, distractedness and nonsensical excuses disappear like mist in the sun. So, please do make use of the opportunity and think about these occurrences in the light of dharma. Without dharma, we'd all be drowning. With dharma we can keep our noses above the water and learn to swim.

When we feel and take into our hearts the confusion and disorientation of people and all beings (really palpable these days!), we become bodhisattvas and things start going click in our mind. Layer after layer, click, click, click, calcified views of our self and existence burst open. That's the bhumis opening and perfecting, indications of correct practice, the ultimate medicine in action. So, please remember that the vow, literally, the *vow* of a mahayana bodhisattva is to personally "I vow to liberate, all sentient beings". Without deeply feeling this motivation, one will not attain the mahayana path to buddhahood and is not likely to have indications of correct practice either. When the course of a boat is right, it is easy to go ahead and sail the seas but if the course is wrong, sailing becomes difficult and you just keep hitting the reef. Bodhisattvas, even though they take a serious and compelling vow, travel with light feet. Bodhisattvas learn to sing and dance on the fields of fire and turmoil. 
 

This world of human beings and animals, by definition, is a samsaric realm. There is never a time when all beings on this planet do not have a need for support. However, during times like this this need is even greater. People are drowning in this ocean of suffering, scared and confused, and yet so many do not have the ripeness and fortunate karma to meet with dharma in one form or the other. But again, our own contemplation, developing of compassion - bodhicitta - and dedicating merits of our practice for all beings is what increases readiness for others. The more we feel the vow of a bodhisattva, the more it gets personal and emotionally binding, the more our practice helps others. Without emotional energy of love, care and devotion our practice becomes reduced to lifeless words and forms. This loving emotion keeps us nourished along the way.

Finally, our gurus, Guru Rinpoche and Yeshe Tsogyal, are fully enlightened and magnificient beings. They are beyond samsara. They have fulfilled their bodhisattva vows and became buddhas. They have done it like we are doing now. They have open invitation for everyone. "Here, grab my hand, I'll pull you to the shore. Just grab it!". When we turn to them for help, we find a safe place in all of samsara. We find a refuge, a safe place where we can come to understand what the heck is going on here. Day and night, we can grab their hand: Namo Guru Rinpoche, Namo Yeshe Tsogyal Ye, Namo Guru Rinpoche, Namo Yeshe Tsogyal Ye, Namo Guru Rinpoche, Namo Yeshe Tsogyal Ye. Spin that mantra with love, for the sake of all sentient beings, and especially for the sake of those around us who are now in deep trouble. Take refuge and share it. Keep taking refuge and keep sharing it!

May all beings be free!

-Kim Katami
Pemako Buddhist teacher,

keskiviikko 18. maaliskuuta 2020

Fear, Mortality and Coronavirus

Fear, Mortality and Coronavirus

I don’t think I have that many friends who don’t do somekind of spiritual practice but I would like to post this short instruction to be shared by my friends as an attempt to help anyone who might found her- or himself overwhelmed by strong emotions due to fear of illness and death caused by coronavirus. Please share this on your wall.

I am a teacher of buddhist meditation. Some might think that ”buddhism” is something religious but I personally view buddhism as a practical philisophy that through different kinds of exercises can help us with our existential and emotional issues. You can think yourself, use your own reason and try the exercises I am about to suggest to you.

So. Coronavirus triggers fear and anxiety in the minds and hearts of many. We can feel this anxious energy that fills the air, even if we are not in the immediate presence of other people. It is kind of natural to be afraid in this life threatening situation. It is kind of natural for us to react to this impending danger by becoming fearful. However, we do not necessarily need to be bound by fear.

It is a simple fact of life that what is born will also die. There is not a single lifeform on Earth that is born and keeps on living. All kinds of beings are born, live for some time and then pass away. This includes everyone, you and I included. This simple fact is something that people forget, even though it is inevitable. Think about it.

Our Western culture does not discuss death openly so when something unexpected happens in life, like we get into some accident or get badly ill, we get very scared because we have forgotten our mortality and are therefore in shock. Then in shock, not understanding the situation, we are gripped by the fear of death or illness and we try to grab onto something that could keep us safe. This is what hoarding is, a primitive subconscious reaction to try get to a safe place. Sure we need food and toilet paper but if you think it through nothing in life can make us perfectly safe.

We can have relative safety through family, friends, insurance and wealth but if you think it through when the moment of death dawns or we get a fatal illness these things are unable to quarantee our safety. This is common logic.

Buddhist meditation teaches you to know yourself. Knowing oneself means becoming aware of what goes on in our mind. Instead of becoming gripped by fear and anxiety, we can learn to notice how the emotion of fear arises, comes into being. We can be aware of it rather than dictated by it. This becoming aware of emotions makes us become free from their negative power. This changes the way how we react and experience things. Learning this is more precious than gold because it helps us to find our true fearless and non-anxious being that cannot be pushed by emotions and reactions. We all have that fearless, peaceful and grounded potential, it just needs to be recognised.

Through this simple exercise we can find safety that does not depend on external factors or other people.
If we contemplate our mortality and become aware of our arising emotions, we will not try to find safety and happiness from things that can’t provide it. This doesn’t mean we need to get rid of any of these things. Actually to have a loving family, trustworthy friends and money is a great blessing. It’s just that through basic life contemplation our way of being and our way of seeing things changes.

Even in difficult circumstances we can remain calm, clear minded and sincerely joyful. Even at the moment of death we can smile and enjoy, and not be scared. Many people are terrified by death because they have not prepared and acquired understanding. This is merely a matter of knowing who we are and what is going on in our mind.

There are many forms and traditions of buddhism, meditation, mindfulness and meditative yoga out there. Please help yourself and seek instructions and guidance from proficient teachers and organisations.

The point is not to join a religion or a group. The point is to acquire first hand knowledge of ourselves. The point is to make sense of life, to reduce and eradicate unstudied confusions, fears and psychological contraction in our minds.

Thank you for reading and sharing this message. Let’s put an end to the pandemic of fear.

Kim Katami
Pemako Buddhist teacher,


lauantai 29. helmikuuta 2020

Why Do Buddhists Turn to Shamanism?

Why Do Buddhists
Turn to Shamanism?






Last year, I found out that noted American buddhist teachers, Shinzen Young and Jack Kornfield are also practitioners of shamanism. Today I found out that another secular buddhist, Mr. Stephen Batchelor, also uses shamanic substances, together with buddhist meditation practices.

Stephen Batchelor, once a Tibetan buddhist monk and a tantric practitioner, has for about 20 years now written about his (apparently mostly) negative experiences with tantric buddhism and has been one of the torchbearers of the so called "secular buddhist movement". I commented on his interview a couple of years ago with the title Why I Didn't Quit Guru Yoga?, see here:

Today I learned from the insightla.org-website,

"When Stephen turned sixty, he took a sabbatical from his teaching and turned his attention to solitude, a practice integral to the meditative traditions he has long studied and taught. He aimed to venture more deeply into solitude, discovering its full extent and depth.
The Art of Solitude documents Stephen’s experiences appreciating and making art, drinking peyote and ayahuasca, practicing meditation and participating in retreats, and training himself to keep an open, questioning mind have all contributed to Batchelor’s ability to be simultaneously alone and at ease."

Like Brad's, my attention was caught by Batchelor's use of peyote and ayahuasca. I have no problem with shamanism as tantric buddhism pretty much is a mixture of shamanism and buddhist philosophy (without psychedelics though), and I neither have a problem with shamanic substances such as peyote and ayahuasca. In fact, I took peyote myself last August in Finland, in the presence of Native American medicine man called Rupert Encinas, though it had no effect on me whatsoever. Long story short, I thought the whole event was really light weight compared to buddhist tantric practice. Anyway.

Mr. Encinas also happens to be a long time teacher of Shinzen Young, another noted buddhist teacher from the secular/mindfulness/science influenced meditation scene. Mr. Encinas told me that Shinzen Young had recently done a 4-day Sun Dance ceremony with him. Those who complete Sun Dance practice can become shamans or medicine men themselves within the tradition. Apparently Young's familiarisation with the tradition is quite extensive.

Together with Batchelor and Young, also Jack Kornfield, who is one of the founders of Insight Meditation Society, has made a public testimony about shamanism, see here: http://openheartopenheart.blogspot.com/2019/08/jack-kornfield-and-shinzen-young-on.html

Seeing how one secular- or theravada-buddhist after the other turn to shamanic practices, I can't help wondering why. And in fact, there is another sutrayana buddhist, Culadasa John Yates, who in the Summer of 2019 suggested that perhaps combination of shamanism and buddhism would tap what his practices have left untapped. See full text and sources here: http://openheartopenheart.blogspot.com/2019/08/culadasa-john-yates-sutrayana-doesnt-go.html

Edit: Adding to the list...

  • Vanja Palmers (soto zen buddhist) says that after decades of zen-meditation he wanted to repeat impressive experience he had as a teenager on LSD: https://youtu.be/gsJ7Z_t5H_o?t=347
  • Vincent Horn, How Psychedelics Improve Your Meditation (And Much More…). "...He found that psychedelics could be used in a similar way to meditation, in order to explore the mind and existence. By setting an intention, and creating an environment similar to meditation, he found he learned some things through psychedelics that his meditative practice hadn’t.Vince says that the visual experience of psychedelics was very different to that of meditation. Psychedelics allowed him to feel connected to his human ancestry, and gave him an ego death experience that shook him more fundamentally than any ego death he’d experienced with meditation. He warns, however, about the power of psychedelics – one experience made him “go crazy” for several days. He would slap a warning label on both psychedelics and meditation, describing them both as trial by fire...: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGA7L1TH1Gc
  • Brad Warner critisizes psychedelic buddhism and Vincent Horn based on buddhist precepts: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZysiPbe8ErY

Is it just because of the lack of merit or lack of inner readiness, why these noted teachers do not turn to mahayana and vajrayana buddhism? Shamanism and buddhism were joined a long time ago so we already have tantric buddhism that has a vast array of lineages, teachings and teachers. Apparently they realise that their chosen paths of buddhism lack something to seek a boost or extra gear from outside buddhism but then, is it because they do not have fortunate karmic connections with lineages and gurus of higher vehicles of buddhism, why they turn to shamanism? Native shamanism seems like a lesser path in comparison to mahayana, not to mention varayana. Or is it simple because of the rigid aspects of Vajrayana buddhism, which is almost all Tibetan, and also mentioned in a critical light by Culadasa because of theocratic features, why these teachers don't feel interested in Tibetan vajrayana? I couldn't blame them if they felt this way because I do too on top of a bunch of other turn offs, but still this trend seems strange.

I am a practitioner and teacher of pragmatic vajrayana buddhism, with a history in zen buddhism, so I know well what kind fo extra gear tantra has to offer to even those who have trained in sutrayana extensively. However, if tantra seems like a turn off and one doesn't want to get involved with empowerments or lamas, I'd recommend looking into Pure Land Buddhism and Buddha Amitabha. In Pure Land Buddhism there are no empowerments, to my knowledge at least, but I'd actually define Amitabha practice a tantric practice and because one turns to Buddha Amitabha for spiritual liberation and knowledge, his presence has the power to tap what in the words of Culadasa, sutrayana leaves "untapped". If I was not a tantric practitioner, with the knowledge and experience I have now, I'd choose Pure Land Buddhism as my path, though with the features of pragmatic dharma.

Thanks for reading. May True Dharma flourish!

Kim,

Pemako Buddhism,


maanantai 10. helmikuuta 2020

Pemako Buddhism: Western Vajrayana Pioneers

Pemako Buddhism:
Western Vajrayana Pioneers


Q: I again come to expectations and concepts, how a buddha should be and behave. Like it would be an automation that fully realized buddha would be teaching, doing charity and so on.

Kim: We, Pemako buddhists, are pioneers and the West is the ground where we have arrived to our pioneering work. There has been mahasiddhas before but not outside the cultures of the East (not known at least). Honestly, I think that, we are the first ones on this hemisphere getting close to buddhahood and eventually becoming mahasiddhas in this life, the first ones within just few years from now, based on divinations and the present stage of a handful of our practitioners.


Already for couple of years, half of our sangha members have achieved stability of rigpa or knowledge of oneself as a buddha. I've spoken about statistics and details on many occasion before so I won't get into that here but people new to this should read What's Next? On Post-Awakening Practice, which gives you a clear and practical sense of this, what to newcomers and outsiders might seem like an outrageous claim. So anyway, it's a completely new thing what we do here in the modern West. Also, Pemako Buddhism is the only non-Eastern lineage of vajrayana to exist. There simply are no others, as all existing lineages of tantra have come from Tibet, in most cases. So we are doing groundbreaking work, like pioneers who roam to new lands, build roads and villages for others to come. In the wider perspective of history this has been done many times before but in our time and culture, it hasn't been done.

There is not a single person existing who grew up in the West and became a mahasiddha. I think we might have to go back 2000 years to find such a person in Jesus Christ but since then there has been nobody, although there has been many monks, nuns and hermits in the Christian tradition.

Looking at the present Western world, there is no one out there who had life experiences like ours because no mahasiddha ever grew up and practiced in the modern West. All available accounts and biographies of yogis and masters are all Eastern and if you start reading them, I at least, always found something to relate to but mostly something I couldn't relate to. I didn't grow up in buddhist culture riding yaks, cooking food on fire, living in tents. I grew up in a modern secular society, watching Sylvester Stallone movies, getting drunk in bars as a teenager, experienced depression, anxiety attacks, wasn't married (twice) by my parents and so on and so on.


To live in 21st century wealthy Western society is very very little like the past cultures of the East. Pretty much the only similarity to Eastern people of the past, is existential confusion, dukkha. So, we just have to do the work ourselves and trailblaze, come up with our own stories of authentic seeking, practice and attainment. It would be nice and supportive for us to already have accounts from perfectly enlightened Western buddhas - people who look, speak and are like us - but as that is not the case we just have to do it ourselves. It's been done before in history many many times so in one sense we are not actually doing something entirely new, it's just new in our present time.


One thing is for sure: Buddhas are not gods, angels, high beings or saints. Buddhas are fully liberated of all form and types of selfing, in other words, they have the insight of emptiness of all phenomena. All texts say this but to me at least it is not so obvious to understand this because at the same time buddhism comes with a lot of cultural baggage and mushroom effect from previous generations of the East that is not helping us Westerners to understand what exactly it is that changes or is transformed with practice, and what isn't.


Our personalities will not change due to attaining perfect enlightenent or mahasiddhahood. We still remain, in my case for example, a heavy metal and electronic dance music loving goof, who plays the blues on guitar. I never was a shiny happy person, smiling that etheric smile of a buddha, so I doubt I will become one when I achieve mahasiddhahood. Actually, that sounds creepy to me and in fact, it looks like the exact opposite.


When the recent layers of self/bhumis have cleaned up for me, I find that I swear as much as I used to prior to dharma practice, when I was around 20 years of age. That's when I think I had the best sense of humour as well, and it's all coming back... I started changing myself, put a lid on my personality when meeting the dharma, like everyone does. So yeah, in my understanding, already quite close to the full attainment, it looks like I am just becoming me, completely and entirely again, except that most of the self-made bs is gone... I certainly have no problem of remaining a fan of 80's heavy metal or whatever cultural traits I have. In fact, that sounds awesome to me. I can be me, without the slightest imposition of a ”spiritual person”, a teacher, bodhisattva, buddha or whatever. Just me! Yay! And you, and we all.


Q: I love this stuff... I have come to this conclusion, too, that it's just about being myself fully. As it can't be any other way. I hate all the hypocrisy and built up "me's".


Kim: You know all these masters have said it that you, me and everything is already liberated and perfect. That we don't need to alter anything is what they mean. And actually changing oneself or imposing a new whatever spiritual-practitioner-bodhisattva-persona on oneself is not only entirely needless but also makes it worse in terms of increasing self-based confusion. But that's how the samsaric mind works and we all can't help reifying it. Also, it doesn't help that a lot of schools and lineages start by having the beginners become followers by carrying external marks and assuming certain ideas, even though they'd have very little or no authentic experience, i.e. insight into nature of mind. This is where our style of practice is different because the first thing we do is to get awakened and then keep going until all 13 bhumis are open and rigpa is stabilised. It is a very different kind of paradigm that the whole world is used to. I personally feel that to do it in any other way is a disservice but that's what people in most walks of life do. Cults of different shapes and forms are everywhere around us, some good, some bad, some harmless, most samsaric.


Lama Karl Eikrem: Alternative Approach to a Healthy Mind, Body and Spirit

Alternative Approach to a
Healthy Mind, Body and Spirit


By: Lama Karl Eikrem 



In today's society, there is no shortage of approaches to improve the health of one's mind, body and spirit. Regularly, we are presented with techniques and programs to reach our full potential; special diets, health programs, psychological tools, motivational exercises, the list goes on. Many of these tools have great benefit, but looking at the present condition of our society, the question remains: do they address the core issue of human dis-ease? 

Authentic spiritual practice aims not so much at improving our relative condition, but takes a step back and invites us to study ourselves as we truly are. This is because the root problem of our discontentment is not that we are unhealthy or stressed, that we don't work out enough, or eat a healthy diet, it is not that are unhappy or dissatisfied with our lives. Rather, the reason is that we do not know the nature of ourselves, the nature of being. How can we possibly find true contentment if we do not know ourselves? 

At the centre of this existential confusion lies the belief in a separate sense of self, in an entity cut off from the external world. If you ask somebody where their sense of self is located, they will probably point to their body, more specifically their head. But is there anything solid in there? Is there some unchanging entity within ourselves, to which we can attach the label "me"? 

This question is the starting point on the path to a truly healthy body, mind and spirit. 

If we start looking closely into this matter, we'll soon come to the realisation that there is no such thing as an "I" to be experienced anywhere. Nevertheless, if left uninvestigated, this basic sense of “me” will continue to attach itself to thoughts and emotions, reinforcing itself through a network of self-based beliefs and opinions; political views, occupation, status, wealth, achievements and so on, all labelled as "mine". 

Because the illusory nature of "I" is dependent on more and more things to identify with, merely trying to improve ourselves, without getting to know ourselves, will not lead to lasting contentment. 

Pemako Buddhism offers high-precision meditative tools to investigate both the notion of "me", leading to what is labelled "awakening"; the permanent dropping off of the notion of self, as well for purifying the reaction patterns, emotional traumas and mental filters that hinder us in experiencing the world directly, as it really is. 

By deconstructing the conceptual beliefs about ourselves, others and the world in general, certain qualities start revealing themselves to us. Equanimity, joy, love and compassion start becoming a part of our everyday lives. Indeed, as we progress on the path of releasing mental and physical tensions, we come to realise that these qualities were never separate from us in the first place. Instead of confining ourselves to "I", "me" and "mine", we realise that we are in fact the brilliant clarity of selfless awareness itself. Thus knowing ourselves is indeed the true meaning of a healthy mind, body and spirit. 

May all beings be free! 

Pemako Buddhism Website: www.pemakobuddhism.com