torstai 10. marraskuuta 2022

After I attain full enlightenment

After I attain full enlightenment


If, after I attain full enlightenment, I fail to bring sentient beings to full enlightenment, may I not attain full enlightenment.

If, after I attain full enlightenment, I fail to teach liberation to sentient beings, may I not attain full enlightenment.

If, after I attain full enlightenment, I fail to bring sentient beings from confusion to freedom, may I not attain full enlightenment.

If, after I attain full enlightenment, I fail to offer a place of rest to sentient beings, may I not attain full enlightenment.

If, after I attain full enlightenment, I fail to be like a mother to all sentient beings, may I not attain full enlightenment.


*


This is a re-rendering of vows that I wrote two years ago.


-Baba, 10.11.22




maanantai 7. marraskuuta 2022

How does awakening, and even full enlightenment, relate to the subtle body?

 

How does awakening, and even full enlightenment, relate to the subtle body?


(from Rainbow Body Yoga Manual, written by Amrita Baba)


In Amrita Mandala, bhumis are very important because they relate to awakening experiences and different stages of purification. There are 13 bhumis, that directly correspond to thirteen bhumi chakras that are used in practice with the purpose of establishing the natural state but also as a map to understand where we are on the map, in relation to the final attainment of full and perfect enlightenment. The thirteen bhumis is a path map, an actual map that gives us the direction where to go when we aim to reach enlightenment. The map is used and read through placing one's attention to different locations in the subtle body and then sensing the felt energy.


Theoretically, the chakra pillars below and above the body are not two separate pillars but one single whole that makes our subtle body. Our subtle body is made of many chakras inside the physical body and outside it. In bhumi pillars, we have seven centers below the body and seven above. At the far ends of both pillars, there are the so called mahasiddha bhumi chakras that relate to, as the name suggests, to the mind state of the mahasiddhas or fully enlightened masters. These mahasiddha bhumis are the three farthest centers away from the body, relating to bhumis 11-13. The direct reason why all human beings can recognise, cultivate and realize the natural state is in the fact that we have natural state within us, in the form of mahasiddha bhumi chakras of our subtle body. The basic state, i.e. the ground of the masters (skt. mahasiddha bhumi) is also represented by other centers and channels in the body and aura. These are areas that never get dirtied by self-based habits and negative patterns, and the actual principle why our innate purity and loving-kindness is never taken away from us, except by being strangers to our own true being. It is because of mahasiddha bhumis, i.e. pure channels and centers, why we can recognize and re-establish ourselves as enlightened beings.


When you connect the bhumi pillars, you will notice that your mind becomes utterly clear and pure. It feels as if you enter a realm of delightful purity.


perjantai 4. marraskuuta 2022

Being a Student of a Guru

 

Being a Student of a Guru


(unedited excerpt from my upcoming book, ”Manual for Seekers, Students and Teachers of Spirituality”)


In tantric yoga, guru is the reason of the student's realization. In tantra, everything depends on the guru. This doesn't mean that the guru is everything there is to the tantric path but it is guru and her/his wisdom and compassion that is the foundation of the whole path. Without guru, there is no tantra, no tantric path and no benefits from it.


For this reason, relationship with a guru is unique among all relationships. Guru shows you who you are and helps you to undelude yourself. Friends, companions, priests, psychologists, doctors, healers, teachers, parents and children can also help in the process of shedding delusions but without guru, without someone who empowers the student and lifts up one's karma, all other relationships fail in the mission of enlightenment. So, relationship with a guru is unique. It's sole purpose is your awakening, your enlightenment, your growth and maturation as a wisdom being.


People often confuse what guru is with something else. Guru may also be one's friend, companion, parent or a child but first and foremost, one's association with a guru is related to enlightenment. For this reason, one should not view or approach the guru like one approaches others. Relationships with one's guru requires attentiveness – listening – and learning of dynamics that cannot be found from other types of relationship.


In the West, some have completely misunderstood the concept of guru and reasoned that it is like a mixture of a friend, teacher, priest, psychologist and a parent, purposefully excluding the very function or dimension of guru's uniqueness and expertise. Of course, it can and should be questioned what makes someone a guru and whether or not that person has the capacity to be in that position but if one checks out, then the guru relationship should not be confused with other common or secular relationships.


One becomes a guru first by becoming a student of tantra which happens through receiving empowerment from another guru. Empowerment is followed by practice and following the instructions and advices of one's guru. Then follows spiritual growth through contemplation and awakening or insight experiences. In this way, through a lenghty and challenging process, the student becomes qualified as a guru, as a master. This process might involve one being a teacher before becoming a master but eventually, through following one's master's instructions, the student becomes like her/his master, becomes a guru. Then begins the new guru's duty to grow her own disciples, to pass the torch to the next generation. The point is that one doesn't become a master, except through a lengthy and trying process, and one isn't finished until one's guru says so.


One of the things that requires special attention in the relationship with one's guru is promises made by the student. In a relationships with a friend, parent or others, you might make promises too lightly and end up forgetting what you've promised or simply don't care what you've promised, and it might still turn out fine, meaning that the other person might not think too much of it. Well, if you don't take the trash out even if you promised to, it's not that serious but if you don't do what you promised to your guru, that is instantly something that the guru pays attention to because even in the case of taking the trash out you're not doing what you promised. In something so simple what to most people might seem insignificant, you communicate to the guru that your words can't be trusted, that you might be an untrusthworthy student. If one cannot be trusted with small simple tasks, it is out of the question to give big responsibilities to such a student. Also giving advanced teachings is out of the question because the student hasn't even mastered the basics of honest conduct, trustworthiness and commitment. If you ever find yourself in a situation that you suddenly realize not having kept one's promise to one's guru; bow your head down and apologize from the bottom of your heart. Then go about fulfilling your promise immediately. Leaving promises unkept, ruins your relationship (skt. samaya) with one's guru. That has long-lasting and detrimental consequences. You don't want to ruin unique karmic connections to gurus and lineages that are the only way out of samsara to full enlightenment. The student's mind has limitations and because of that we cannot avoid mistakes but making mistakes and rectifying them is an essential part of the whole growth process. When you become aware of a mistake, apologize, correct it and move on. That's the correct way to go about it.


There is a saying, ”To normal people big mistakes are small mistakes. To spiritual practitioners, small mistakes are big mistakes.”


Actions, manners, ethics, attentiveness, considerateness, and trustworthiness are all under a special microscope when it comes to spiritual practitioners and in a relationship with a tantric master. Masters of all times have instructed us to be very attentive of our actions – thoughts, words and physical – because we don't want to accumulate negative karma but we do if we don't pay attention to what we do and think. This is a crucial point because we end up confused and lost exactly because we don't pay attention or don't know how to pay attention to our actions. We are in samsara, going round and round in our minds, lifetime after lifetime, solely because of our own actions. Imagine one life with an unhappy self-centered, then imagine ten thousand unhappy lives. It's a long haul and it is all because of our me, me, me, I, I, I. There is no other entity, like an almight God in heaven, doing any of that to us or deciding things on our behalf, it is all our own responsibility, actions and their karmic consequences. And here we come to a very important point about the guru relationship.

By definition, a tantric master sees more in you than you do in yourself because the master has finished the path or is at least farther than the student is. This is the underlying principle that makes the student's growth possible, if the student is paying attention and listening. If you are still getting to know the guru and probing whether the guru-figure is trusthworth and suitable for you or not, it is probable that the guru either won't pay much attention, give you one-on-one time or have expectations towards you. You should take your time feeling into the guru, her person, her qualities and her personality traits. Taking time to feel this out means to seek into the physical company and presence of the guru, whether in formal or informal circumstances, at retreats, satsangs and so on. You should spend time with the guru to find out if her teachings and her as a person feels like a match for you. If you take the time, there will be a moment when you realize that it is or isn't a fit. If you feel that it is a match, you have found your spiritual home, a guru and/or a lineage that you have good connection with. If, on the other hand, you feel that it is not a match, then make a bow and go about finding a master who resonates with your heart. If you are sincere and have a real need to find a guru, i.e. to get out of samsara for the sake of all beings, you will find your heart-guru relatively quickly. If you don't feel the heart connection with some guru and reason that you will take empowerment and practice the teachings even if you don't really even like the guru, don't do this because this has potentially negative karmic consequences. At least, if you stay with some guru until you find a more suitable one, you should always remain honest and respectful in your behaviour. If you behave badly, the karma is on you and again with spiritual relationships you don't want such karma for yourself because it will keep good teachers, gurus and lineages away from you possibly for many lifetimes. If you treat people badly, they want to stay away from you. If you treat a guru badly, you create karma in your subtle body, like a banner hung on your chest that says, ”I don't have manners and I treat masters poorly and unfairly”. Authentic gurus have the ability to see such karma and don't take such people as students. Then you are left with inauthentic ones or lesser paths that don't lead to full enlightenment, possibly for lifetimes.


That the student takes the time and makes the effort to find this out is important because it lays the foundation for the whole path that comes after it.



tiistai 25. lokakuuta 2022

About friendship and boundaries in dharma

 

About friendship and boundaries in dharma


>Not as a student lecturing his teacher but as a Dharma friend sharing his observations to a Dharma friend.

-This is going to be long and winding... The word friendship gets used a lot nowadays but I think the concept of friendship has lost a lot of its depth and meaning. When people start to practice guru yoga and are trying to figure out what it is, who this guru is and so on, I always tell them to look at it as if they were getting to know a new person. It makes sense in the context of guru yoga too that it takes time to know the guru, not to even mention developing trust and faith. A friendship does not develop overnight but in my experience takes years and many shared experiences to build it on. This is one big reason why online sanghas and online dharma is so problematic because people don't even meet physically. Basically, you don't get to know a person through online exchange.

I've been blinded by my own western democratic conditioning and it has made my life and my work a lot more difficult that it could have been. Through many years of inventing "pragmatic tantra" I've learned that some principles of pragmatic dharma (as defined by Ingram and others) cannot be applied to tantra and just makes everything problematic and even conflicting.

They knew all about this in Asian dharma traditions. By setting up forms and norms, they set up boundaries. Personally I never had problems with boundaries because I've learned the traditional ways (incl. etiquette, code of respect, senior-junior, methodology and hard training) since I was a child but in my lack of understanding spiced with the Western spirit of invention (arrogance?), I questioned if dharma could be boiled down to the bare essentials. It worked great but then I started seeing the cracks, actions and decisions by my students that seemed stoopid, immature and disrespectful. At first I had no idea what was wrong but then I started realising that they lacked the context. My students had realised emptiness, traversed through all the bhumis but their "realization" looked only partially like mine. That's because most of you were never exposed to the above mentioned traditional ways.

It is true that I never formally taught a course entitled "The six paramitas". I never gave you a list of them or other similar expositions, and explained to you how all things in life can and should be tied together in the context of dharma practice. Having said that, I've spoken about all of it all the time. I've taught about ethics, lifestyle, work, family-life, patience and generosity. I've even lead pointing out sessions where you tie all these things with one's recognition of the natural state. And yet, I can say that none of my students got and understood what I've pointed out, told them and first and foremost exemplified with my daily example, be it online or in person. When I've said that my students haven't been listening, this is what I've meant. You heard some, the bits about meditative practice but missed most of the rest. Ay yay yay, you missed a lot. I'm not blaming anyone, I'm just stating what you got and didn't get.

I've told my students for many years to go and study with other teachers, especially if you/they have hard time getting my teaching. I've said that I don't teach the very basics and of course I don't teach the dharma like most other teachers do. But now that my style, in my view, has turned out to be so insufficient and incomplete, the method needs to be changed quite significantly so that students get taught and develop understanding from those traditional or Asian aspects of dharma, or what you might call the other paramitas than meditative (dhyana paramita). Yeah, despite of having more than a dozen students who've realized the full scope of emptiness, I don't see the perfection of wisdom (prajna paramita) in you because you say and do things that in my view are stoopid, immature and disrespectful. I am not calling anyone stoopid, I am just saying that your realization doesn't look like mine and you don't feel the same as I do, except partially. I admit that at this stage of my dharma work, I feel I have failed but fortunately there is still time to rectify these mistakes and better the method before I die.

Back to your comment.

Reg making dharma friends. I have learned the hard way how westerners misunderstand and misinterpret their relationship with a western master. Again, I could say that this happens because you're not hearing me well, and additionally because you're not meeting me in person (or do so too rarely) or living with me. Karl, the Lion of Norway, is still the only one whose ever lived with me and because of that he knows my pulse the best.

My view of friendship is like I described above. If you don't meet me and get to know me in person, friendship between us won't develop. I would even say that not meeting my students in person sabotages my dharma transmission (again) because dharma transmission is much more than just pointing out the nature of mind.

As a person, I am not above you. As people, we are equal. In dharma, mutual respect between teachers and students is essential. Just like in all relationships, one might feel uncertain, doubtful or scared to say something but it is only a sign of understanding what a true friendship is when you speak your mind even when you might not feel that comfortable doing that. You've seen me do that so many times. I'm not going to have my students be disrespectful or offensive towards me anymore (one of my problems because of my western democratic mind) and I am learning to set my boundaries as a teacher of tantra, but if I sense your sincerity and honesty, it will be OK.


Baba, 25.10.22

torstai 20. lokakuuta 2022

Be yourself, find your own way

 

Be yourself, find your own way



For few months, I haven't been that active in facebook. I've taken time off to contemplate my public persona. Some of my students left and some were upset about my various posts at various places. I know I have made comments that were contradictory and make jokes that are harsh, and in general say things that are direct. Apparently that Finnish directness is interpreted as aggressiveness by some non-Finns.


At first I felt that I'll just stop saying what I really think. I've tried that for a while now... and yeah, that hasn't felt good. If you've ever tried censoring yourself, you'll know that it will make you feel like shit. It takes the life and joy out of you. I can't do that, even with the cost of loosing some students or some people getting upset. Many years ago I was adviced to "be yourself, find your own way" by one of my gurus. It's one of the best advices I ever got.


It sounds crazy that someone like me who can teach everything about wisdom practices and who should be able to say a thing or two based on my life experiences, has to try self-censorship in trying to find out a way to not make people upset but that's what I had to do. Like with everyone else, there is an exchange between myself and others and back, and this time I was in this situation when I had to go into this territory. I could do with people and my students not loving me but when I feel not even being liked, it makes you feel strange. I've asked myself if I really am a very difficult and unpleasant person to be around with.


There are countless dharma stories of students who couldn't deal with their masters and left. I can say for certain that very few people would be willing and ready to study with someone like Guru Rinpoche. Most people just couldn't deal with him or masters like him because they are very demanding and uncompromising. If Padmasambhava was here now, people would be red flagging and stigmatising him as a reckless abuser, all over the place on internet forums. Yup, he'd be crossing people's boundaries on daily basis and they wouldn't be able to take it. You know, he was actually and actively involved with an assassination plot. Most buddhists past or present would never approve that.


Sometimes I wonder if all the modern things and easy lifestyle has made things better or worse for dharma. Sometimes I think that modern people have become like big babies who say they're after the truth but are actually just spiritual materialists. Oh gosh, I miss the old days. And I actually miss the Asian ways because sometimes this overtly touchy-feely leftist "Western dharma" is just too much to deal with.


I've seen it countless times that especially towards a Western teacher, Western students loose their ability to listen fast when their Western worldview and values are questioned. People approach the dharma with the same view as they approach everything else in life. People wear the dharma like they wear cheap jewelry. It is not serious enough. Not enough hardships and setbacks. Not enough humbling experiences. Not enough dead ends and despair.


Anyway.


In the middle of all this I've contemplated something Yogananda wrote in his autobiography about his guru, Sri Yukteswar. He wrote that had Sri Yukteswar been less direct, he'd have probably been the most sought after guru in all of India. Apparently the Lion of Bengal was also direct and didn't save his words. I would choose him as my guru any day for the fact that he was enlightened.

Spirituality (skt. dharma) cannot be separated and isolated from the rest of the world. There is no "pure spirituality" that is separate from people and their/our lives and our experiences but there is this persistent belief that such "pure and clean spirituality" exists because there are so many teachers who never loose their pretense and self-censorship. I feel bad for saying this but someone's got to say it because it doesn't sit right with me that people are fed such childish fairytales.


Spirituality is all about people, their lives, their stories, their experiences and their expression, and that's a lot of different feels, tones and hues.


If being me shoots me in the foot in terms of popularity, so be it, but for my own truth's sake, I have to be and express things in a way that feels right to me.


With you,


Baba, 20.10.22


torstai 6. lokakuuta 2022

When Yogis Laugh

 

When Yogis Laugh


I remember having tea or lunch at Terayama Sensei's home. He'd sit on the other side of the table, making slurping and chewing sounds. As he ate and drank, his lips would move together with his cheeks. Watching him do this I thought that the foods and beverages didn't taste even nearly as good in my mouth as they did in his! He was able to enjoy shamelessly and full-heartedly what was in front of him.


When people eat good food, they say, "Oh wow, this is good..." and munch it. They raise their glasses for good wine. Over urinals, men grunt with the relief. People, when having orgasms, let out animalistic sounds. When they laugh, there is sound. But all these are typically tame. There is always a lid of fear, insecurity, doubt or shame attached to these moments. Yogis and yoginis don't have these burdens or at least have less of them. When yogis grunt over urinals, it is like New Year's fireworks. When yoginis have orgasms, it is like the last long note sung by Goddess Sarasvati herself. When yogis laugh, the voice echoes into the eternity never dying down. It is true.


Baba, 6.10.22

maanantai 26. syyskuuta 2022

Enlightened Action

 

Enlightened Action


I think there is much more to expression of realization than what Karl wrote, "With the further perfections of 11th, 12th and 13th, this ordinary experience becomes much purer, warmer, softer, more beautiful and complete. But even then, the expression of this realization (i.e. conduct) is not perfect due to the traces of karma in the physical cells."

I am sketching the often mentioned manual for students (also to seekers and teachers) and thinking about ways how to convey and adress this question because it is the heart and soul of dharma. Ultimately, spiritual realization and expression of it, or conduct according to the awakened nature are not two separate things but the same thing. This means that spirituality and conduct, that is expression in action in this world, do not exist separately from each other, i.e. neither of them exists in vacuum. And yet some have completely missed this point thinking that they do exist separately.

The first vow of the Vows of Bodhisattva goes, "I vow to liberate all sentient beings". This can be looked at from two different perspectives: from the perspective of one's personal practice where one's self-based habits are the beings that one vows to liberate and from the perspective of self-based habits of all beings that one vows to liberate over endless future lives. It may sound overwhelming but ultimately these two perspectives are not separate but same.

I have often said that I don't think that there will ever be time when all sentient beings are realized buddhas but from the perspective of vow or conduct, it doesn't matter. By taking a vow to do it anyway or to strive towards the liberation of all sentient beings, including their personal karmas, is what bodhisattva-hood and buddahood takes a stand for. Bodhisattvas take this impossible vow not because of the final ultimate enlightenment of all beings in some distant future but because something can be done about it right now. That's the rebellion, that's the passion in true compassion. This in turn flips the whole question of conduct or expression around. In a sense, this turns the finger to point at ourselves.

There is nothing else to enlightened conduct than to be of service and to help others in all means available. A bodhisattva fulfills her/his vow by helping and serving others, in other words, by helping seekers to find and practice the dharma so that they can discover who they are. That's it. That's all and it is extremely important because if bodhisattvas don't act on their vow, who else will? Who else can? This is the sole duty of bodhisattvas who have taken the vow and have become bodhisattvas. The point is that there cannot be bodhisattvas apart from bodhisattvic or compassionate action. Which bhumi or stage one is at, is besides the point.

The thing is that we are here now and we will not be here later. In few decades or so, none of us will be here anymore. Then what? How will you be able to help beings then?

If we are bodhisattvas who have sworn, have taken an oath, to help and serve others (sentient beings) through the dharma there is never a later time for action simply because it doesn't make sense. The world is on fire now, people are in pain now so how could we postpone fulfilling our vows later? If we see people drown but decide to help them later for whatever reason, they will drown and die right in front of our eyes and the chance to help them will never come back. If we understand the vow and the immense depth and power of it, and have contemplated the fact of impermanence and death, how could we wait to express what is in our hearts already? Like I said, the enlightened heart-mind and expression of the enlightened heart-mind are not two separate things.

In hindu dharma this is expressed in the three most basic forms of yoga: jnana yoga (eradication of dualistic delusions, emptiness practice in buddhist terms), bhakti yoga (devotional practices that reveal the original softness of the heart, compassion/sambhogakaya practices in buddhist system) and karma yoga, the yoga of action and service. These three are not separate but facets of the same thing. Actions coming from a clear head and soft heart. If you just want a clear head and soft heart but there is no action or the actions are limited to suit one's own preferences, well according to countless masters and bodhisattvas this is nothing but an egotrip, far from great perfection.

So the question was will there be a point when expression is perfect? My answer is that it will never be perfect without actions of service towards those around us. It is because of this mistaken view that some attainment or state of the mind alone is perfection, is whats wrong here.

Realization is what you do. Without action, the buddha has no body.

If it helps for you to know, I have spent about 30 000 hours in sitting practice but more than that I have answered emails, made facebook posts, wrote books, wrote posts on dharma forums, wrote my blog, talked on the phone, talked on Skype, travelled in cars, trains and airplanes; booked venues, went to pick up the key, swept the floors, carried chairs, put the coffee on, solved problems, did bhumi analyses, gave advice and had long discussions and finally on top of everything else, taught hundreds of courses and retreats. I've done all this when being badly burnt out, severely sleep-deprived, extremely socially anxious and financially broke for years and years, just because that's what the vow is to me.

In the words of Vesa-Matti Loiri, one of the greatest finnish actors and artists of our time, "If you don't give it your all, you don't give anything". I had the fortune to meet him once when he told me of him having taken Bodhisattva Vows.

If you don't give it your all, you don't give anything.

 

Shirin: >would you do everything exactly the same way if you could choose?

-Exactly the same way, of course not but at the time I didn't have options. I did what I did and that's the reason why you are all here. That's why there's over 200 awakened people in the world now. I could have started teaching after my full enlightenment. That'd mean I would be just starting out things now. This would mean that, you Shirin for example wouldn't hear of me or my teachings in years or even decades. There'd be no dozen buddhas, no sangha of 80 people, no 200 people awakened. On the other hand I would have been saved from tons of harmful and stressful things that I've had to endure, but I chose to begin to teach early because it was the only thing that made sense.

>would you recommend to others to do as much as you did even though they feel close to a burn out?

-You all, my students and those who teach, get everything ready because I have laid out the way for you. You don't need to work as hard as I did. This has down sides. We all know the story of the rich man who made a fortune out of nothing and whose children got spoiled. I am not saying this angrily nor harshly but with genuine care.

How many of my students are ready to endure even half or even quarter of the hardship that I've endured? How many have really grown out of the ego and act in the world for the spiritual wellfare of others?

I've said for years that I am in the business of growing lions, instead of sheep but how many lions have grown and matured in this sangha? How many can match and even go beyond my energy? How many will ever match it? With these words I am trying to wake you up from your stubborn slumber and deliver a vital message so that you'd realize what we could do together!

I sat and practiced and did a million things for you and all sentient beings. I took rebirth voluntarily and journeyed the whole range of realization, just to be an example to you. I went through hells for you and all sentient beings. I knew I'd lose my health but I did it anyway. I knew I'd be broke for years but it didn't worry me. My heart has been broken countless times throughout these years and it hurt every time but I'm still here. The only reason for that is my vow, in other words my love for all sentient beings, particularly my students, and my doubtless devotion towards my gurus.

All this out of necessity and just because it is possible. When the moment of my death comes, I'll jump right into it, knowing perfectly that I gave it my all. That'll be a good death but until that moment I'll keep punching and pointing out the heartmind of the buddha for human beings, hopefully with your help.

-Baba, 26.9.22