Reinventing
Tantra, Kegan and Pemako Buddhism
From
Pemako Buddhist Sangha Facebook group.
Kim:
This is probably the best podcast discussion I've ever heard. So much
of it strikes directly at what I've been up to as a buddhist teacher
and founder of Pemako sangha.
https://soundcloud.com/imperfect-buddha-podcast/100-imperfect-buddha-david-chapman-on-stages-of-maturation-dzogchen-the-future-of-buddhism
Ben:
This is brilliant. Being a part of a stage 5 group is what I've been
looking for, for so long. This encapsulates so much of that struggle.
Akseli:
I might have not even began practicing tantra without Chapman's
Vividness stuff. Having not had that many visionary experiences, no
visits from deities, etc., the experiential gap would have taken a
lot of work to bridge had someone not have already done it!
Kegan's
model is enormously interesting in terms of our cultural
stuck-upness, but also really helpful for navigating different types
of interpersonal conflicts in day-to-day life. Glad to see it
mentioned here, too
Kim:
I haven't read Chapman in few years and have taken a break of writing
projects myself but I've meant to finish what he started with his
"Reinventing Tantra" series. I think his foundation is
brilliant to build on. To my knowledge, no one has made tantra
"current" in the modern world. I was exhilarated to learn
and read of Chapman's introduction of this updating and reinvention
of tantra but for reasons that he himself mentioned, he didn't finish
it. I hope to put in writing what we have been doing in Pemako sangha
for over a decade now
Listening
to that podcast I came to think of couple of aspects in our style of
vajra practice that support getting to Kegan's stage 5, that of
embodied and enlightened independence in the world of constant change
and relationships. Babaji's advice, "Be yourself. Find your own
way", really goes a long way and this very point is too rarely
expressed and encouraged by training systems. Or maybe that is not
the best way to say it but systems (stage 4) are supposed to be
toolboxes that can be thrown away after all the tools have been fully
utilized and enlightenment/buddhahood reached. In this very purpose
most systems fail, considering that vajrayana buddhism is built on
the idea of "buddhahood in this life", not in the next, not
in 7 or whatever lives from now but this very life... Attaining
buddhahood is an anomaly in buddhism, rather than a rule, which
actually means that systems (stage 4) fail to do the very task they
exist for. For this reason individuals fail to find a way and become
who they truly are, i.e. get fully enlightened. I've been talking
about this for a decade and have seen how stuck dharma practitioners
get with systems (stage 4) by not being able to see past them. They
also get offended for wrong reasons and that's why they remain caught
by methods, missing the most crucial point of awakening and
enlightenment. Very few seems to take bodhicitta really seriously.
So,
becoming strong and independent in existential sense is a big one. It
is built on recognition of selflessness. In our prayers we chant, "I
am the Guru, I'm in the Pure Land, I am the Buddha..." because
that-is-it... BUT, this is a post-emptiness view, not pre-emptiness
view.
Without
the vision of emptiness of phenomena it is futile to even mention
strength and independence because it is not about egotripping on
childish mind games. In my understanding independence as it has been
demonstrated by the spiritual strength of masters such as
Padmasambhava, means not only to realize emptiness but also that
one's very life force and actions, personal expression, becomes the
embodiment of buddhanature. One will not get there without
contemplating what Babaji suggests, "Be yourself. Find your own
way". The greatest of all empowerments is recognition of
ourselves as buddhas. It is an empowerment that we give ourselves but
like Chapman and Kegan point out, it is easy (deathly!) to mistake
stage 3 for stage 5. Those who preach about already-perfect-dzogchen
and advaita without practice and signs of fruition fall into this
category.
So,
a lot of it has to do with learning to trust our gut and following
our intuition. This is a very crucial point but if you start
investigating this, no one in buddhism tells you to develop your
intuition... Why? Because traditionalists think they have it all
already figured out, so all they say is "keep doing the
practice" according to whatever syllabus. Just do another
retreat or year of practice without real sign of insight, that's what
it is for most out there. I know because I've done it and seen it.
Methods are believed in so firmly that very few ever begins to ask
questions whether anyone is actually getting there. Small signs of
succesful practice might be there but still this is far far... from
buddhahood. Very few "graduate" as buddhas, in other words
lots of folks get trapped in stage 4, stuck in a method, like a bardo
of somekind. As a vajrayana practitioner who takes buddhahood in this
life seriously I do not believe in the gradual idea that it comes
some time in next life or lives. Screw that. If you ain't done with
your karmic purification in a maximum of decade of practice, forget
it. If we are really talking about buddhahood in this life, OK, bring
it and save us from whatever excuses you might come up with.
Buddhism
is a vast collection of methods and the vast majority of them is
constructed by men. Men are good at mechanics and engineering. We
figure out things, so we come up with systems and methods. While this
has the benefit of coming up with systems there is other side that is
left entirely without care and attention, and that is intuition. If
you look at the wider world of yoga and meditation, folks always come
up with and market methods, and most of them have a fixed form. This
yoga, that yoga, this reiki, that reiki, this meditation, that
meditation and so on. Because self-delusion and suffering is in the
mind, that is an abstract, nonphysical thing, fixed forms inevitably
miss the mark...
Most
buddhist practitioners are completely alien to their intuition, this
feminine side in them. This applies to both men and women but
again... How do we become independent and mature into true characters
without intuition? See, graduating of training methods does not
directly translate into becoming buddhas, so something is clearly
completely off.
I
quoted Chapman's tweet recently where he said that tantric (tsalung
practices) cannot have a fixed form. There we have it again. Most
systems teach fixed forms of tantric practice. This is men giving
tantra, that is inherently flowing and fluid, a fixed, solid, frozen
form. A complete miss again. Where are the buddhas to prove that this
type of approach works? Nowhere. The masculine approach is so
one-sided that excellent results don't come.
If
we take a master woodworker, that master creates an excellent work of
art from any piece of wood you give him/her. There are no excuses and
no whining, no dogma and you get exactly what you ask for. When it
should be the norm in vajra buddhism that mahasiddha buddhas come
like from assembly line, one after the other, we are left with scraps
and need to travel here and there to have a glimpse of someone who
was someone in past life. Scholarly study, years spent in retreat,
performing this or that exercise, receiving many empowerments from
many someones, being recognised as someone etc is simply not good
enough. We need to realise emptiness(!). And not only emptiness
(nirmanakaya buddha) but bliss and light as well (sambhogakaya
buddha). If you seriously say buddhahood in this life, there you go.
No excuses, no nonsense, no thukdam/samadhi, no bardo. Mahasiddhas
play and dance in the body and out the body. Death as a transition is
nothing to real yogis.
And
that's Kegan's stage 5 in terms of spiritual accomplishment. You
really and truly graduate, grow out, from systems, if they are good
and taught proficiently! You master them from inside out. This is
completely different from merely having performed some techniques for
few years... But again, because practically no one teaches tantric
students what tantric practices are for and how they cannot have a
fixed form, no one gets to meta level and graduates... Then you have
people arguing with each other what is and what isn't correct tummo,
because one lama taught this and other that. Oh dear. As you know I
teach "masterclasses" of all of our practices for this
exact purpose. And that is also why there are extraordinary results.
Some
trad vajrayana buddhists have also asked me about our vows because we
have a very simple set of vows. Well, again, be yourself, find your
own way. If we accept vows as something that we "follow"
and "avoid breaking", this is a very superficial view of
the whole path and ourselves as buddhas. If we have genuine insight,
conduct comes accordingly. That's why I think Bodhisattva Vows and
Refuge are really everything that is needed. With this view, I hope
my students empower themselves through their own experience rather
than fill their head with ideas of pure and impure or being a
follower of this or that.