Näytetään tekstit, joissa on tunniste papaji. Näytä kaikki tekstit
Näytetään tekstit, joissa on tunniste papaji. Näytä kaikki tekstit

lauantai 13. helmikuuta 2016

Advaita Enlightenment And Dzogchen Enlightenment

Advaita Enlightenment And
Dzogchen Enlightenment

The next story, told by Sam Harris, demonstrates how the view and experience of enlightenment differ between two teachers: Papaji (H.W.L. Poonja, a well known advaita vedanta guru, disciple of Ramana Maharishi) and Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche, a well known Tibetan vajrayana buddhism and dzogchen master.



I have linked two demonstrative videos where the mentioned teachers meditate. From them one can see how different their states are. The other one being quite confused and unclear and the other one being matured, clear and open.



- Kim Katami, 14.2.2016.




From Sam Harris' book Waking up, ch. 4:

Poonja-ji’s influence on me was profound, especially because it came as a corrective to all the strenuous and unsatisfying efforts I had been making in meditation up to that point. But the dangers inherent in his approach soon became obvious. The all-or-nothing quality of Poonjaji’s teaching obliged him to acknowledge the full enlightenment of any person who was grandiose or manic enough to claim it. Thus, I repeatedly witnessed fellow students declare their complete and undying freedom, all the while appearing quite ordinary—or worse. In certain cases, these people had clearly had some sort of breakthrough, but Poonja-ji’s insistence upon the finality of every legitimate insight led many of them to delude themselves about their spiritual attainments. Some left India and became gurus. From what I could tell, Poonja-ji gave everyone his blessing to spread his teachings in this way. He once suggested that I do it, and yet it was clear to me that I was not qualified to be anyone’s guru. Nearly twenty years have passed, and I’m still not. Of course, from Poonja-ji’s point of view, this is an illusion. And yet there simply is a difference between a person like myself, who is generally distracted by thought, and one who isn’t and cannot be. I don’t know where to place Poonja-ji on this continuum of wisdom, but he appeared to be a lot farther along than his students. Whether Poonja-ji was capable of seeing the difference between himself and other people, I do not know. But his insistence that no difference existed began to seem either dogmatic or delusional.

On one occasion, events conspired to perfectly illuminate the flaw in Poonja-ji’s teaching. A small group of experienced practitioners (among us several teachers of meditation) had organized a trip to India and Nepal to spend ten days with Poonja-ji in Lucknow, followed by ten days in Kathmandu, to receive teachings on the Tibetan Buddhist practice of Dzogchen. As it happened, during our time in Lucknow, a woman from Switzerland became “enlightened” in Poonja-ji’s presence. For the better part of a week, she was celebrated as something akin to the next Buddha. Poonja-ji repeatedly put her forward as evidence of how fully the truth could be realized without making any effort at all in meditation, and we had the pleasure of seeing this woman sit beside Poonja-ji on a raised platform expounding upon how blissful it now was in her corner of the universe. She was, in fact, radiantly happy, and it was by no means clear that Poonja-ji had made a mistake in recognizing her. She would say things like “There is nothing but consciousness, and there is no difference between it and reality itself.” Coming from such a nice, guileless person, there was little reason to doubt the profundity of her experience.

When it came time for our group to leave India for Nepal, this woman asked if she could join us. Because she was such good company, we encouraged her to come along. A few of us were also curious to see how her realization would appear in another context. And so it came to pass that a woman whose enlightenment had just been confirmed by one of the greatest living exponents of Advaita Vedanta was in the room when we received our first teachings from Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche, who was generally thought to be one of the greatest living Dzogchen masters. Of all the Buddhist teachings, those of Dzogchen most closely resemble the teachings of Advaita. The two traditions seek to provoke the same insight into the nonduality of consciousness, but, generally speaking, only Dzogchen makes it absolutely clear that one must practice this insight to the point of stability and that one can do so without succumbing to the dualistic striving that haunts most other paths.

At a certain point in our discussions with Tulku Urgyen, our Swiss prodigy declared her boundless freedom in terms similar to those she had used to such great effect with Poonja-ji. After a few highly amusing exchanges, during which we watched Tulku Urgyen struggle to understand what our translator was telling him, he gave a short laugh and looked the woman over with renewed interest.

“How long has it been since you were last lost in thought?”
he asked.
“I haven’t had any thoughts for over a week,”
the woman replied.
Tulku Urgyen smiled.
“A week?”
“Yes.”
“No thoughts?”
“No, my mind is completely still. It’s just pure consciousness.”
“That’s very interesting. Okay, so this is what is going to happen now: We are all going to wait for you to have your next thought. There’s no hurry. We are all very patient people. We are just going to sit here and wait. Please tell us when you notice a thought arise in your mind.”

It is difficult to convey what a brilliant and subtle intervention this was. It may have been the most inspired moment of teaching I have ever witnessed. After a few moments, a look of doubt appeared on our friend’s face.

“Okay... Wait a minute... Oh... That could have been a thought there... Okay...”
Over the next thirty seconds, we watched this woman’s enlightenment completely unravel. It became clear that she had been merely thinking about how expansive her experience of consciousness had become—how it was perfectly free of thought, immaculate, just like space—without noticing that she was thinking incessantly. She had been telling herself the story of her enlightenment—and she had been getting away with it because she happened to be an extraordinarily happy person for whom everything was going very well for the time being.

This was the danger of nondual teachings of the sort that Poonja-ji was handing out to all comers. It was easy to delude oneself into thinking that one had achieved a permanent breakthrough, especially because he insisted that all breakthroughs must be permanent. What the Dzogchen teachings make clear, however, is that thinking about what is beyond thought is still thinking, and a glimpse of selflessness is generally only the beginning of a process that must reach fruition. Being able to stand perfectly free of the feeling of self is the start of one’s spiritual journey, not its end.”

Links


Advaita-valaistuminen ja Dzogchen-valaistuminen

Advaita-valaistuminen ja

Dzogchen-valaistuminen



Seuraava Sam Harrisin kertoma tarina kertoo erinomaisesn selkeästi kuinka merkittävästi tunnetun advaita vedanta gurun ja Ramana Maharishin oppilaan, Papajin (H.W.L Poonja) ja tunnetun tiibetiläisen dzogchenmestarin Tulku Urgyen Rinpochen näkemykset ja kokemukset valaistumisesta eroavat toisistaan.



On tosiasia, että se minkä olen itse määrittänyt termillä ”herääminen” on osa huomattavan laajaa mielen puhdistamisen kokonaisuutta, jota myös henkisen kehityksen poluksi kutsutaan.



Olen linkittänyt alle kaksi demonstratiivista videota joilla em. opettajat meditoivat. Niistä voi nähdä kuinka erilaisessa mielenmaisemassa he ovat, toinen tunkkaisen sekavassa, toinen selkeässä ja avarassa.



Olen linkittänyt myös tekemäni bhumi-analyysin, joka esittää täsmällisen kehitysasteen jolla sekä Papaji, että Tulku Urgyen olivat.



- Kim Katami, 14.2.2016.



Open Heart,








Sitaatti Sam Harrisin kirjasta ”Herääminen. Opas uskonnottomaan henkisyyteen” s. 158-161, alkuteos Waking up.



”Poonjaji (Papaji) vaikutti minuun syvällisesti erityisesti, koska hänen käsityksensä olivat vastapainoa siihenastisille, uuvuttaville ja epätyydyttäville ponnisteluilleni meditaation parissa. Mutta hänen menetelmänsä sisältyvät vaarat kävivät pian ilmi. Poonjajin kaikki tai ei mitään-opetustyyli velvoitti hänet tunnustamaan valaistuneeksi jokaisen, joka oli kyllin mahtaileva tai kiihkomielinen julistaaksen sitä olevansa. Niinpä todistin toistuvasti, kuinka kanssaopiskelijani julistivat saavuttaneensa täydellisen ja ikuisen vapauden, vaikka mikään heissä ei poikennut tavallisesta – tai jos poikkesi, niin huonoon suuntaan. Joissakin tapauksissa nämä ihmiset olivat selvästi tehneet jonkinlaisen läpimurron, mutta koska Poonjaji piti itsepintaisesti kiinni siitä, että oivallus on todellinen vain, jos se on lopullinen, se sai monet pettämään itseään henkisten saavutusten suhteen. Jotkut lähtivät Intiasta ja ryhtyivät guruiksi. Tietääkseni heillä kaikilla oli Poonjajin siunaus levittää hänen oppejaan. Kerran hän ehdotti sitä minullekin, vaikka minulle itselleni oli selvää, että minusta ei ollut kenenkään guruksi. Lähes kaksikymmentä vuotta myöhemmin minusta ei edelleenkään ole siihen. Poonjajin näkökulmasta tämä on tietenkin harhaa. Mutta on yksinkertaisesti eri asia olla minunkaltaiseni ihminen, joka tavallisesti ajautuu ajatusten vietäväksi, kuin joku, jolle niin ei käy ja jolle se ei ylipäätään ole edes mahdollista. En tiedä, mihin Poonjaji sijoittuu tällä viisauden jatkumolla, mutta hän vaikutti olevan paljon oppilaitaan pidemmällä. En tiedä, pystyikö Poonjaji näkemään itsensä ja muiden välisen eron. Hänen hellittämätön näkemyksensä, jonka mukaan mitään eroa ei ole, alkoi kuitenkin vaikuttaa dogmaattiselta ja harhaiselta.



Erään tapahtumasarjan seurauksena Poonjajin opetusten epäkohdat nousivat selvästi esiin. Pieni ryhmä kokeneita meditaation harjoittajia (joukossamme oli monta meditaatio-opettajaa) oli järjestänyt matkan Intiaan ja Nepaliin. Tarkoituksena oli viettää kymmenen päivää Lucknow'ssa Poonjajin luona ja sen jälkeen opiskella Kathmandussa kymmenen päivää tiibetinbuddhalaista dzogchenharjoitusta. Kuinka ollakaan, Lucknow'ssa ollessamme eräs sveitsiläinen nainen ”valaistui” Poonjajin läsnäollessa. Suurimman osan viikkoa naista juhlittiin kuin uutta Buddhaa. Poonjaji esitti toistuvasti naisen olevan todiste siitä, että totuuden täydellinen oivaltaminen on mahdollista, vaikka ei meditoisi lainkaan, ja meillä oli ilo nähdä naisen istuvan Poonjajin vierellä korokkeella ja kuulla hänen selittävän, kuinka autuasta hänen olonsa maailmankaikkeudessa nyt olikaan. Hän todella säteili iloa, eikä mikään viitannut siihen, että Poonjaji olisi erehtynyt tunnustaessaan hänet. Naisella oli tapana sanoa sellaisia kuin ”Ei ole muuta kuin tietoisuus, eikä sen ja todellisuuden välillä ole mitään eroa.” Hän oli erittäin mukava ja vilpitön ihminen, eikä hänen kokemuksensa syvyyttä ollut siksi syytä epäillä.



Kun tuli aika meidän ryhmämme lähteä Intiasta Nepaliin, nainen kysyi, saisiko hän tulla mukaamme. Hän oli hyvää seuraa, joten kehotimme häntä lähtemään matkaamme. Jotkut meistä olivat myös uteliaita näkemään, miten hänen valaistumisensa ilmenisi toisenlaisessa ympäristössä. Ja niin nainen, jonka valaistumisen oli vastikään vahvistanut yksi merkittävimmistä advaita vedantan elossa olevista edustajista, istui samassa huoneessa, jossa saimme ensimmäiset opetuksemme Tulku Urgyen Rinpochelta, jota pidettiin yleisesti yhtenä merkittävimmistä elossa olevista dzogchenmestareista.



Kaikista buddhalaisista opeista dzogchenin opit muistuttavat eniten advaitan oppeja. Molemmissa perinteissä pyritään samaan oivallukseen, näkemään tietoisuuden ei-dualistinen luonne, mutta yleensä vain dzogchen tekee ehdottoman selväksi, että tämä oivallus vaatii harjoittamista, kunnes se muuttuu pysyväksi eikä ihminen enää joudu antamaan periksi dualistisille pyrkimyksille, jotka ovat useimpien muiden polkujen vaivana.



Eräässä vaiheessa Tulku Urgyenin kanssa käymäämme keskustelua sveitsiläinen ihmenaisemme puhkesi julistamaan ääretöntä vapauden tilaansa käyttäen samoja ilmauksia, joilla oli niin suuri vaikutus Poonjajihin. Saimme seurata paria hupaisaa sananvaihtoa, joiden aikana Tulku Urgyen yritti ymmärtää, mitä tulkkimme hänelle kertoi. Lopulta hän naurahti lyhyesti ja katsoi naista entistä kiinnostuneemmin.



Koska viimeksi ajatukset valtasivat sinut?” hän kysyi.

Minulla ei ole ollut ainuttakaan ajatusta yli viikkoon”, nainen vastasi.

Tulku Urgyen hymyili.

Viikkoon?”

Niin.”

Ei lainkaan ajatuksia?”

Ei, mieleni on täysin rauhallinen. On vain puhdas tietoisuus.”

Erittäin mielenkiintoista. Nyt tehdään niin, että me kaikki odotamme, että sinulle tulee ajatus. Ei ole mitään kiirettä. Me kaikki olemme hyvin kärsivällisiä ihmisiä. Me vain istumme tässä ja odotamme. Kerrotko sitten, kun huomaat mielessäsi ajatuksen.”



Tämän väliintulon nerokkuutta ja hienovaraisuutta on vaikea pukea sanoiksi. Se saattoi hyvin olla kaikkein innostavin opetustilanne, missä olen koskaan ollut.

Hetken kuluttua ystävämme kasvoille ilmestyi epäilevä ilme.



Okei... Hetkinen... Öh... Tuo oli ehkä ajatus... Okei...”



Seuraavan puolen minuutin aikana näimme, kuinka naisen valaistuminen haihtui kuin tuhka tuuleen. Oli selvää, että hän oli vain ajatellut, kuinka avara hänen tietoisuudestaan oli tullut, että siinä ei ollut ajatuksen ajatusta, että se oli täydellisen puhdas, kuin avaruus, huomaamatta ajattelevansa lakkaamatta. Hän oli kertonut itselleen valaistuneensa ja uskonut siihen, koska hän sattui olemaan epätavallisen iloinen ihminen, jonka elämässä kaikki oli tuolloin erittäin hyvällä tolalla.



Tällainen oli vaara, joka piili Poonjajin luokseen tuleville jakamissa ei-dualistisissa opetuksissa. Itseään oli helppo pettää ja ajatella saavuttaneensa pysyvän läpimurron, varsinkin koska Poonjaji piti itsepintaisesti kiinni siitä, että kaikkien läpimurtojen on väistämättä oltava pysyviä. Dzogchen-opetukset tekevät selväksi, että sen ajattelu, mikä on ajattelun tuolla puolen, on yhä ajattelua, ja välähdys minättömyydestä on yleensä vain alku prosessille, joka tulee vielä loppuun saakka. Täydellinen irrottautuminen minuudesta on vasta henkisen matkan alku, ei sen päätepiste.”



Linkkejä










maanantai 1. helmikuuta 2016

Ramana and Nisargadatta In a Pickle

Ramana and Nisargadatta In A Pickle



The following quotes are about Nisargadatta's inability to help his students to awakening. I'm yet to find out how many people might have awakened directly through Ramana Maharishi's instructions but apparently, they seem like a very small group of people. This text gives the idea that Nisargadatta had the same problem.

For clear and effective instructions about awakening, read and download for free: Awake! Handbook of Awakening.




*



Another morning, Nisargadatta Maharaj started speaking though in a very weak voice.

"You people come here wanting something. What you want may be knowledge with a capital 'K' - the highest Truth - but nonetheless you do want something. Most of you have been coming here for quite some time. Why? If there had been apperception of what I have been saying, you should have stopped coming here long ago! But what actually has been happening is that you have been coming here day after day, identified as individual beings, male or female, with several persons and things you call 'mine'. Also, you think you have been coming here, of your own volition, to see another individual - a Guru - who, you expect, will give you 'liberation' from your 'bondage'.

Do you not see how ridiculous all this is ? Your coming here day after day only shows that you are not prepared to accept my word that there is no such thing as an 'individual'; that the 'individual' is nothing but an appearance; that an appearance cannot have any 'bondage' and, therefore, there is no question of any 'liberation' for an appearance. Do you even now realize that if the very basis of your seeking is wrong, what can you achieve? Indeed, is there anything to be achieved? By whom? By an appearance?"

Nisargadatta Maharaj.
 
David Conway reports about Nisargadatta:

One morning Maharaj seemed to be more-than-usually frustrated about our collective inability to grasp what he was talking about.

"Why do I waste my time with you people?" he exclaimed. "Why does no one ever understand what I am saying?"

I took my chance: "In all the years that you have been teaching how many people have truly understood and experienced your teachings?"
He was quiet for a moment, and then he said, 'One. Maurice Frydman.' He didn't elaborate and I didn't follow it up.

From "Last teachings of Nisargadatta": http://sri-nisargadatta-maharaj.blogspot.pt/…/the-last-days…


*

Teachers or gurus not being able to deliver their messages and life-changing experiences is a universal problem. In my analysis (see Awake! Handbook of Awakening, pg. 124) I have come up with five key factors that create an ideal situation for anyoneto wake up. 

1. The teacher is awakened and knows exactly what it is and how it happens.  
2. He has clarity and skills to convey it through exact verbal pointers. 
3. He has particular techniques that are succinctly meant for generating awakening.
4. There is enough one-on-one exchange between the teacher and the student so that the processing can be finished quickly. 
5. The student has recognised that his problems are essentially caused by self-delusion. Therefore he is motivated to go through the process. 

The opposite of these five key factors are: 

1. The teacher does not exactly understand what awakening is or how it happens, even if he himself is awakened. 
2. He doesn't have clarity and skillfulness to convey it through exact verbal pointers.
3. He does not know distinct techniques for generating awakening. In fact his techniques might be completely irrelevant or only vaguely relevant.
4. There is not enough one-on-one exchange between the teacher and the student which is why getting to the result is needlessly delayed. 
5. The student doesn't have correct motivation, no real need for awakening.

If the problem lies in the teacher and his whatever methods that do not work, and he blames the students for that, that simply is a very unfortunate state of affairs. Regardless how approved and highly regarded the tradition in question might be, this is professional incompetence, plain and simple. In all other fields of pedagogy, such teachers would be fired for the lack of professional skills.

We don't hear about the tantrums of professionally educated teachers because they have learned pedagogy and possess a solid set of teaching skills. For this reason, secular education is effective. Without the skills of the teacher it would be a very different situation. It would be considered amateuristic of the teacher to not get the young students reading or writing. Unfortunately, this is exactly what happens in the spiritual scene on regular basis. 

Gurus, lamas and teachers who are expected to pass on the light of knowledge (jnana, prajna), can not deliver because they lack basic understanding of pedagogics and set of techniques to aid the learning process. Even if it is the teacher's very job to get her or his students awakened, even this low standard is not met. Because the teacher doesn't understand her or his own awakening, he cannot effectively pass it on to others. This happens in all traditions. This is very unfortunate. 



"Forget 'I am That*'. 
I realised so much more since then. 
It's so much deeper." 

- Nisargadatta before his death, reported by Jean Dunn 




*Nisargadatta's best selling book.



It is a great pity that spiritual traditions often lack reason. When we go to school we know there is a system to follow, a syllabus, and our learning is according to that. We know what we are going to get. If the school teacher said, 

"We're just going to iprovise it and teach the kids something vague with a random outcome",  the parents would chase the teacher out!

In dharma we are told, "Oh yes, of course, you will get awakened and enlightened. Of course!" but we aren't explained what it means and how it happens. We might get laughed at for asking such questions. The teacher might say, "Don't be such a silly child asking such a silly question because you cannot understand awakening". The crowd, all biased to this view, might join the laughter of the teacher. This is all wrong. 

It is the teacher's fault if she or he cannot explain and transmit his teaching and his realizations. All things can be verbally explained, in detail. Words, concepts and terms are not the realization itself, of course, but they are an indispensable and skillful way to convey the teaching. Verbal means are as important as non-verbal ones. This should be understood. If and as it makes perfect sense in all other fields of learning, why wouldn't it in the field of dharma?
 

I recommend people to be critical about a teachers who are unable to explain things clearly. Many people end up going to meetings and teachings, travelling on the other side of the world, year after year, dollar after dollar, not getting things right, just learning false concepts that they then carry around with them, still being miserable and confused about their true being. I've seen this over and over. Demand quality from your teacher as you do from the mechanic who fixes your car. You would never accept a car that was still broken after some time at the carage while still having to pay!







- Kim Katami, 1.2.2016

Helsinki, Finland.




For clear and effective instructions about awakening, read and download for free: Awake! Handbook of Awakening.

Open Heart,
www.en.openheart.fi