Näytetään tekstit, joissa on tunniste tulku urgyen. Näytä kaikki tekstit
Näytetään tekstit, joissa on tunniste tulku urgyen. Näytä kaikki tekstit

maanantai 27. helmikuuta 2023

One year as a buddha by Ugi

One year as a buddha by Ugi



It was exactly one year ago - on the 26th of February '22 - when I woke up in the morning and all difference between meditation and everyday life, all separation between awareness and appearances, as well as all sense of "being on my way" to Enlightenment was gone for good. I fully realized my mind to be no other than the mind of Buddha, Shiva or Christ.

 

If it wasn't for the kindness and compassion of my yogic master Amrita Baba (see picture in 1st comment), I would never have tasted the fruit of liberation. Baba was the one who introduced me to the true nature of mind in 2016 and pointed out the innate goodness of boundless compassion (bodhicitta) in me.

 

And it was Baba who taught me the uttermost essential practice of how to directly tune into the mind of enlightenend masters like Guru Rinpoche, Gampopa or Jesus. This enabled me to progress quickly along the path of Liberation without getting stuck in misconceptions about Enlightenment or the common traps along the Path (like pride or doubt). It is to him that all my gratitude and devotion goes on this first anniversary. Thank you forever, my most precious teacher


Why am I writing so openly about this? Because people need to know that the Enlightenment of the Buddhas is not an esoteric fantasy, or an unachievable goal reserved for superhuman beings, or a mystical state that only happens accidentally.


I don't blame anyone for having such views. I also had them. That is because there simply aren't many people around anymore who truly understand - from their own firsthand experience - the inner science of the Dharma, the practice of Liberation. There are many who teach bits and pieces from the Dharma (or simply use the same terminology), but not many who teach it in its full scope. Unfortunately, that's the case in most traditional lineages as well.


For this reason, I find it so important to not keep secret about this. To let people know that the promise of all the enlightened masters is indeed true:

You all possess Buddha/Christ/Shiva nature which is the essence of the very mind that is reading this right now. And because of that, it is possible to become a living a Buddha, a living Christ, in this life-time. With the proper motivation, correct instructions of a master, and the support of a loving sangha, it can be done within a decade even.


If you want to know more about my path, then please watch the following interview where I go into much detail about my journey of Liberation.

And if you want to know more about the teachings of Amrita Baba and the practices that have brought me here, then find more information here:



English website:

www.amritamandala.com



German website (where I'm involved as an instructor):

www.amritamandala.de



May this find you well & May All Beings Be Free!


Much love,


Ugi


https://youtu.be/rmV12A25oEg

sunnuntai 22. marraskuuta 2020

Buddhahood! Will We Ever Get There!?!?

 

Buddhahood!

Will We Ever Get There!?!?


I took a long break of bhumi readings and therefore it seems discussion about bhumis has been very little during the past year or so. Let's bring it back! Nevertheless, people have been practicing diligently and making excellent progress. We have a number of sangha members who have opened all their bhumis and made significant progress in perfections which is also unique. One of the reasons why I took that break is that I wanted to have unoccupied time and space for my own practice to better understand the process of karmic purification in terms of the 13 bhumi model. Based on this, I gave specific instructions for perfection stage practice of Rainbow Body Yoga that are now available to all sangha members.

I cannot convey to you the joy and satisfaction I feel for being able to do this because what we are looking here are very precise and detailed instructions for purification of the whole karmic body, one layer or one bhumi after the other, until it is entirely dealt with. Together with genuine concern for the liberation of all sentient beings (bodhicitta), this is a purely mechanical and logical procession of tantric vipashyana leading to full enlightenment or buddhahood. I could not have done it without my gurus so my gratitude goes out to them again and again and again!

The thought of *our sangha members* attaining buddhahood is something that I've intentionally brought up many times in my talks since 1-2 years ago. Last time I did this was on the last retreat when I read a bit from Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche, who said that in his lifetime he met "many men and women" who had attained buddhahood, that it is "not a fable or a fairytale" and that it is possible indeed for people "world over". These words can be found from his book Repeating the Words of the Buddha.

By talking and discussing this topic among our sangha I've wanted to bring the big, bad, great and unreachable "buddhahood" closer to us, to pop some of the imaginary bubbles we might have about it. There is so much fluff about it that I think this kind of demystifying discussion is very necessary. Just like we have absorbed values and views from christianity that we might not even be aware of, in the same way, and I think I can speak for all those who have been exposed to buddhist culture, we have absorbed ideas and limitations from it. The most harmful of them being the subconscious idea that buddhahood cannot *actually* be attained by any of us little people and that buddhahood is the property of only the most excellent practitioners living in the holy caves of the East. Even if masters such as Tulku Urgyen repeatedly tell to us that it is indeed possible, I don't think I've ever met anyone who would have really taken this seriously. Oh gosh... This brings back (limiting and absurd) memories! It's time to put an end to false views and ineffective and unsuitable practices.

So... We have the exact knowhow of purfying each karmic layer after the other... When will we get there then!?

Sivakami, who passed away 10 years ago this month, taught me many useful things and one of those was couple of different kinds of divination. I've used, should I call it perhaps "mahasiddha divination" many times over my career of practice on various things. I have for example used it for finding out when I or my students would reach a certain stage of practice. For example, when my first bhumi opened in 11/2011, I did a divination the same day finding out when the 6th would open. The result of the divination was July of 2013, about 2½ years after the first opening. It turned out correct 2½ years later.

Earlier this week I sent instruction of this type of divination to 11 sangha members who are in the process of perfecting bhumis. The nature of this exercise is to get an answer when one would reach buddhahood, coming up with a date for it. Half of the people haven't yet replied to me and couple of the answers I didn't feel were correct. However, 5 of them did. Based on this it looks like there will be 5 people reaching buddhahood during the next 5½ years, until the Summer of 2026. Three of those before the end of 2022.

One saying that I like is, "This life is not a rehearsal". To put it in this context, our practice is not a rehearsal. It is inevitable that all this stabilising of the natural state, that has been happening since 4 years ago, and quick progress of purification results in complete purification.

I guess we'll see when the time arrives.

May the sun of dharma shine on you, for the sake of all sentient beings.


Kim Rinpoche, 22.11.2020

Pemako Buddhism

www.pemakobuddhism.com


keskiviikko 18. joulukuuta 2019

A MESSAGE TO PEOPLE THE WORLD OVER By Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche

A MESSAGE TO
PEOPLE THE WORLD
OVER

By Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche


Foremost I would like to tell you that an enlightened essence is present in everyone. It is present in every state, both samsara and nirvana, and in all sentient beings; there is no exception. Experience your buddha nature, make it your constant practice, and you will reach enlightenment. In my lifetime I have known many, many people who attained such an enlightened state, both male and female. Awakening to enlightenment is not an ancient fable. It is not mythology. It actually does happen. Bring the oral instructions into your own practical experience and enlightenment is indeed possible; it is not just a fairy tale.

From ”Repeating the Words of The Buddha”


lauantai 12. lokakuuta 2019

Jetsunma Tenzin Palmo: First Breakthrough

Jetsunma Tenzin Palmo:
First Breakthrough


”The initial realization of the nature of the mind is the first breakthrough. It’s a very important point in all Buddhist schools. At that moment, you cease to be an ordinary person. You become in Buddhist parlance an arya, a noble one. It doesn’t mean you are finished. It doesn’t mean you are a high level bodhisattva. We can fall back from this. But still, this is a big breakthrough. We now understand what is true and what is not true. We don’t have to take it all on faith any more. It is a direct nondual experience. The point is that it is very easy. It’s not difficult, and it’s not something that can only be attained after years and years of practice.”*

It would be nice if someone would come along and find a method by which people could awaken. Even the Buddha couldn't do that.”**


I rejoice that Kim is enabling so many practitioners to get awakened in such an approachable manner. May the Dharma flourish for the benefit of all beings!”***



*Jetsunma Tenzin Palmo, Reflections on a Mountain Lake, p. 191
**Jetsunma Tenzin Palmo (source)
**Jetsunma Tenzin Palmo (source)

Jetsunma Tenzin Palmo

sunnuntai 23. heinäkuuta 2017

Chatral Rinpoche doubting Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche

Chatral Rinpoche doubting
Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche

A few days into offering these empowerments, I met Chatral Rinpoche. His appearance was striking: he wore coarse felt garments and had a prominent nose and a Khampa bearing. Our conversation began like this:

"You, lama! Where are you from?" he demanded brusquely.

"I am from Nangchen.

"From where in Nangchen?"

"I am a descendant of Chokgyur Lingpa.

"I've been to Tsikey and I didn't see you there.

"I didn't always stay at Tsikey.

"Then where are you from? Out with it!"

"Chokgyur Lingpa's daughter, Konchok Paldron, had four sons one of whom
was my father.

"Hmmm ... hmmm ... I had heard that you were supposed to be the nephew
of Neten Chokling. I know him from Dzongsar, where he came to visit Dzongsar Khyentse, but I've never heard that he had a lama nephew. Now I hear that our Dudjom Rinpoche is receiving the Three Sections from such a nephew, and we all know that plenty of these so-called Khampa lamas come here to Central Tibet to try out their various tricks. So, I was wondering if you were just another one of them. Hmmm...

He was staring at me with his big eyes glaring the whole time.

A lot of Khampa lamas come here and cheat people by giving empowerments to which they have no lineage."

Dudjom Rinpoche, who was sitting right there, broke in and said,

It was I who asked him to give this transmission."

And soon they began to crack one joke after another, during which Chatral
Rinpoche turned to me with a smirk and said,

Okay, I guess you are not a fake after all. You can go ahead and give him the empowerment then."

- From Blazing Splendor, p. 304, Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche

lauantai 2. huhtikuuta 2016

Great Perfection (Dzogchen) by Mingyur Rinpoche

Great Perfection (Dzogchen)

by Mingyur Rinpoche



with Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche and 
Nyoshul Khen Rinpoche

What does this word mean,” I asked, pointing to the tibetan word kadak.
Oh, that’s a very important term,” he replied, pleased to see my interest. “Do you remember what I told the students last night about the mind’s true nature?” the truth was that I didn’t understand much of what he said when he taught, so I looked down and shook my head in embarrassment. Seeing my reaction, he patted me gently on the shoulder and said, “there’s no need to feel embarrassed. When I was young i had to learn the meaning of all these words just like you.” he then paused for a moment and looked at me with such affection that all my fear and embarrassment dissolved. “What i taught the students last night is that our true nature is completely pure and good. the word you asked about, kadak, means ‘pure from the very beginning.’ it might not always seem like this is the case, but there isn’t the slightest bit of difference between your true nature and the Buddha’s. In fact, even an old dog has this original purity.”

What does purity mean?” I asked. “Purity means that our true nature is already perfect and complete,” he continued. “None of our confusion and fear can change this inner purity. It doesn’t get worse when we suffer or improve when we become enlightened like the Buddha. We don’t need to add anything to it or take anything away, nor do we have to do something to get it. it’s here with us each and every moment, like a diamond in the palm of one’s hand.” “If our true nature is so wonderful,” I asked, “Then why do we suffer?” “That’s a good question,” he answered. “The problem isn’t that we need to get something that we don’t already have, or that we have to get rid of all the things we don’t like. The Buddha can’t magically appear and take away all our suffering and confusion. The problem is that we don’t recognize what we’ve had all along. We get so caught up in the drama of our lives that we don’t see the radiant purity of our own minds. This nature is with us even when we feel scared, lonely, and angry.”

I looked up at my father’s kind face as he spoke these words and a feeling of tremendous love and respect welled up from deep within me. I still didn’t fully grasp what he was trying to teach, but i started to open to the possibility that there was more to life than all the thoughts and feelings that crowded my young mind. What he had just introduced me to was the ground of the Great Perfection, the inner reality that we discover on the spiritual path.

With this newfound confidence, I continued to meditate on my own. Though I still didn’t have a direct experience of what my father was trying to teach me, I soon found that by focusing my mind on something, I could experience a glimpse of tranquility. Despite this development, I still thought of meditation as something that would help me get rid of the parts of myself that I didn’t like. I sincerely hoped that meditation would lead me to
happy, peaceful states of mind where panic and fear could not touch me. As I would soon find out, however, what my father was leading me to was much more radical than that.

For the next few months I continued to visit my father every day, and he taught me more about the Great Perfection. Oftentimes we wouldn’t talk at all as we sat together. My father would simply sit in front of the large window and gaze off into the sky as I sat quietly by his side and tried to meditate. I desperately wanted his approval, so I always did my best imitation of what i thought a good meditator should do. I sat bolt upright and tried to make it look like I was absorbed in some deep experience, while in actuality I was just repeating a mantra in my mind and trying not to get lost in thought. Occasionally, I would open my eyes and peek up at my father, hoping that he had noticed my good meditation posture and ability to sit still for so long.

One day, as we sat together in silence, I glanced up at him in the middle of my meditation and was surprised to find him gazing down at me. “Are you meditating, son?” he asked. “Yes, sir,” I said proudly, filled with joy that he had finally noticed. My answer seemed to amuse him greatly. he paused for a few moments and then said gently, “Don’t meditate.”

My pride vanished. For months, I’d been doing my best to copy all the other meditators who came to be with my father. I learned some short prayers, sat in the right posture, and tried hard to still my turbulent mind. “I thought I was supposed to meditate,” I said with a shaky voice.

Meditation is a lie,” he said. “When we try to control the mind or hold on to an experience, we don’t see the innate perfection of the present moment.” Pointing out through the window, he continued, “Look out into the blue sky. Pure awareness is like space,
boundless and open. It’s always here. You don’t have to make it up. All you have to do is rest in that.”

For a moment, all of my hopes and expectations about meditation dropped away and I experienced a glimpse of timeless awareness. A few minutes later he continued, “Once you’ve recognized awareness, there’s nothing to do. You don’t have to meditate or
try to change your mind in any way.”

If there’s nothing to do,” I asked, “Does that mean that we don’t have to practice?”
Although there’s nothing to do, you do need to familiarize yourself with this recognition.
you also need to cultivate bodhichitta and devotion, and always seal your practice by dedicating the merit so that all beings may recognize their own true nature too.
The reason we still need to practice is that at first we only have an understanding of the mind’s true nature. By familiarizing ourselves with this understanding again and again, however, it eventually transforms into direct experience. Yet even then we still need to practice. Experience is unstable, so if we don’t continue to familiarize ourselves with pure awareness we can lose sight of it and get caught up in our thoughts and emotions again.
On the other hand, if we are diligent in practice, this experience will transform into a realization that can never be lost. This is the path of the Great Perfection (dzogchen).”

With these words, he stopped talking and we both continued to rest in pure awareness, gazing off into the deep blue sky above the Kathmandu Valley.


One of the main questions I had at the time concerned the results of the Great Perfection, so one day I approached Nyoshul Khen Rinpoche to ask for clarification. “To attain buddhahood,” I began, “the sutras say that we have to purify obscurations, perfect the ac-
cumulations of merit and wisdom, and slowly refine our practice of generosity, discipline, and the rest of the six perfections for an incredibly long period of time, but my father and
Saljey Rinpoche taught me that buddhahood is actually right here in the present
moment. They said that if we strain and strive for some enlightenment in the future, we actually move farther away from this pure awareness. Don’t these two presentations contradict each other?”

Not at all,” rinpoche replied. “ In fact, all those things that we uncover slowly on the sutra path are actually inherent qualities of pure awareness. The Great Perfection is an effortless path in which you accomplish everything without doing anything. Recognizing the empty essence of awareness perfects the accumulation of wisdom, while recognizing its spontaneously present clarity perfects the accumulation of merit. The union of this emptiness and clarity is the union of the two accumulations. Moreover, this approach is
also the union of the development and completion stages that we practice in deity yoga, and of skillful means and knowledge. Once you realize the nature of mind, compassion spontaneously manifests. Seeing the potential that all beings possess, you will naturally
feel respect for them and want to help them to realize this true nature for themselves.
You will also experience genuine devotion for the teachers who introduced you to pure awareness and fully appreciate their accomplishment. So you see, all the qualities of
enlightenment are right here with us. We don’t need to look anywhere outside of the present moment.

Actualizing these innate qualities,” he continued, “Is the best result we could hope for. Flying in the sky, reading minds, and other magical powers are no big deal. These days, we can do most of these things anyway through modern technology. I’ve flown all around the world with hundreds of people in a giant metal tube, so what’s the big deal if you can levitate a few feet? The precious fruition of the Great Perfection manifests when we’ve familiarized ourselves with pure awareness to such a degree that we never waver from that state. There’s nothing more to hope for than that.”

Khen Rinpoche’s words trailed off as he finished his explanation, and he stopped talking.
together, we sat in silence, resting effortlessly in the beauty and simplicity of the present moment. The words of these great masters stay with me to this day. When people ask me about the Great Perfection, I have nothing more to say than to repeat these simple teachings, which were entrusted to me like a great treasure by my kind teachers.



keskiviikko 17. helmikuuta 2016

Waking Up by Sam Harris

Waking Up

by Sam Harris

In general, Harris's book is wonderful. It is analytical and clear on many points but I find that it is also narrow minded in some things. I find that he is unreasonably critical towards religious people and mystical experiences. His book is called ”Waking up” which obviously refers to about waking up of false notion of there being a self, or an I, in our minds.

As quoted, Harris quite well explains both I-based and I-less modes. However, he never brings these two together. He sort of leaves it hanging in the air, doesn't finish what he started. I think that this book makes people consider awakening as a possibility, but just like in the case of most other books on the topic, the book merely discusses the atter without actually helping the readers to get there. Nevertheless, it is an OK book to read.

For practical instructions for awakening, go here: Awake! Handbook of Awakening.

- Kim Katami

Open Heart,


WHAT ARE WE CALLING “I”?

The pronoun I is the name that most of us put to the sense that we are the thinkers of our thoughts and the experiencers of our experience. It is the sense that we have of possessing (rather than of merely being) a continuum of experience. We will see, however, that this feeling is not a necessary property of the mind. And the fact that people report losing their sense of self to one or another degree suggests that the experience of being a self can be selectively interfered with. Obviously, there is something in our experience that we are calling “I,” apart from the sheer fact that we are conscious; otherwise, we would never describe our subjectivity in the way we do, and a person would have no basis for feeling that she had lost her sense of self, whatever the circumstances.

The self that does not survive scrutiny is the subject of experience in each present moment— the feeling of being a thinker of thoughts inside one’s head, the sense of being an owner or inhabitant of a physical body, which this false self seems to appropriate as a kind of vehicle. Even if you don’t believe such a homunculus exists—perhaps because you believe, on the basis of science, that you are identical to your body and brain rather than a ghostly resident therein— you almost certainly feel like an internal self in almost every waking moment. And yet, however one looks for it, this self is nowhere to be found. It cannot be seen amid the particulars of experience, and it cannot be seen when experience itself is viewed as a totality. However, its absence can be found—and when it is, the feeling of being a self disappears.

CONSCIOUSNESS WITHOUT SELF

This is an empirical claim: Look closely enough at your own mind in the present moment, and you will discover that the self is an illusion. The problem with a claim of this kind, however, is that one can’t borrow another person’s contemplative tools to test it. To see how the feeling of “I” is a product of thought—indeed, to even appreciate how distracted by thought you tend to be in the first place—you have to build your own contemplative tools. Unfortunately, this leads many people to dismiss the project out of hand: They look inside, notice nothing of interest, and conclude that introspection is a dead end. But just imagine where astronomy would be if, centuries after Galileo, a person were still obliged to build his own telescope before he could even judge whether astronomy was a legitimate field of inquiry. It wouldn’t make the sky any less worthy of investigation, but astronomy’s development as a science would become immensely more difficult.


GRADUAL VERSUS SUDDEN REALIZATION

We wouldn’t attempt to meditate, or engage in any other contemplative practice, if we didn’t feel that something about our experience needed to be improved. But here lies one of the central paradoxes of spiritual life, because this very feeling of dissatisfaction causes us to overlook the intrinsic freedom of consciousness in the present. As we have seen, there are good reasons to believe that adopting a practice like meditation can lead to positive changes in one’s life. But the deepest goal of spirituality is freedom from the illusion of the self—and to seek such freedom, as though it were a future state to be attained through effort, is to reinforce the chains of one’s apparent bondage in each moment.

Traditionally, there have been two solutions to this paradox. One is to simply ignore it and adopt various techniques of meditation in the hope that a breakthrough will occur. Some people appear to succeed at this, but many fail. It is true that good things often happen in the meantime: We can become happier and more concentrated. But we can also despair of the whole project. The words of the sages may begin to sound like empty promises, and we are left hoping for transcendent experiences that never arrive or prove merely temporary.

The ultimate wisdom of enlightenment, whatever it is, cannot be a matter of having fleeting experiences. The goal of meditation is to uncover a form of well-being that is inherent to the nature of our minds. It must, therefore, be available in the context of ordinary sights, sounds, sensations, and even thoughts. Peak experiences are fine, but real freedom must be coincident with normal waking life.

The other traditional response to the paradox of spiritual seeking is to fully acknowledge it and concede that all efforts are doomed, because the urge to attain self-transcendence or any other mystical experience is a symptom of the very disease we want to cure. There is nothing to do but give up the search.

These paths may appear antithetical—and they are often presented as such. The path of gradual ascent is typical of Theravada Buddhism and most other approaches to meditation in the Indian tradition. And gradualism is the natural starting point for any search, spiritual or otherwise. Such goal-oriented modes of practice have the virtue of being easily taught, because a person can begin them without having had any fundamental insight into the nature of consciousness or the illusoriness of the self. He need only adopt new patterns of attention, thought, and behavior, and the path will unfold before him.

By contrast, the path of sudden realization can appear impossibly steep. It is often described as “nondualistic” because it refuses to validate the point of view from which one would meditate or practice any other spiritual discipline. Consciousness is already free of anything that remotely resembles a self—and there is nothing that you can do, as an illusory ego, to realize this. Such a perspective can be found in the Indian tradition of Advaita Vedanta and in a few schools of Buddhism.


Cessation and theravada-gradualism



Those who begin to practice in the spirit of gradualism often assume that the goal of selftranscendence is far away, and they may spend years overlooking the very freedom that they yearn to realize. The liability of this approach became clear to me when I studied under the Burmese meditation master Sayadaw U Pandita (student of Mahasi Sayadaw). I sat through several retreats with U Pandita, each a month or two in length. These retreats were based on the monastic discipline of Theravadan Buddhism: We did not eat after noon and were encouraged to sleep no more than four hours each night. Outwardly, the goal was to engage in eighteen hours of formal meditation each day.

The logic of this practice is explicitly goal-oriented: According to this view, one practices mindfulness not because the intrinsic freedom of consciousness can be fully realized in the present but because being mindful is a means of attaining an experience often described as “cessation,” which is thought to decisively uproot the illusion of the self (along with other mental afflictions, depending on one’s stage of practice). Cessation is believed to be a direct insight into an unconditioned reality (Pali: Nibbāna; Sanskrit: Nirvana) that lies behind all manifest phenomena.

This conception of the path to enlightenment is open to several criticisms. The first is that it is misleading with respect to what can be realized in the present moment in a state of ordinary awareness. Thus, it encourages confusion at the outset regarding the nature of the problem one is trying to solve. It is true, however, that striving toward the distant goal of enlightenment (as well as the nearer goal of cessation) can lead one to practice with an intensity that might otherwise be difficult to achieve. I never made more effort than I did when practicing under U Pandita. But most of this effort arose from the very illusion of bondage to the self that I was seeking to overcome. The model of this practice is that one must climb the mountain so that freedom can be found at the top. But the self is already an illusion, and that truth can be glimpsed directly, at the mountain’s base or anywhere else along the path. One can then return to this insight, again and again, as one’s sole method of meditation—thereby arriving at the goal in each moment of actual practice. This isn’t merely a matter of choosing to think differently about the significance of mindfulness. It is a difference in what one is able to be mindful of. Dualistic mindfulness— paying attention to the breath, for instance—generally proceeds on the basis of an illusion: One feels that one is a subject, a locus of consciousness inside the head, that can strategically pay attention to the breath or some other object of awareness because of all the good it will do. This is gradualism in action. And yet, from a nondualistic point of view, one could just as well be mindful of selflessness directly. To do this, however, one must recognize that this is how consciousness is—and such an insight can be difficult to achieve. However, it does not require the meditative attainment of cessation. Another problem with the goal of cessation is that most traditions of Buddhism do not share it, and yet they produce long lineages of contemplative masters, many of whom have spent decades doing nothing but meditating on the nature of consciousness. If freedom is possible, there must be some mode of ordinary consciousness in which it can be expressed. Why not realize this frame of mind directly?

Nevertheless, I spent several years deeply preoccupied with reaching the goal of cessation, and at least one year of that time was spent on silent retreat. Although I had many interesting experiences, none seemed to fit the specific requirements of this path. There were periods during which all thought subsided, and any sense of having a body disappeared. What remained was a blissful expanse of conscious peace that had no reference point in any of the usual sensory channels. Many scientists and philosophers believe that consciousness is always tied to one of the five senses—and that the idea of a “pure consciousness” apart from seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, and touching is a category error and a spiritual fantasy. I am confident that they are mistaken.

But cessation never arrived. Given my gradualist views at that point, this became very frustrating. Most of my time on retreat was extremely pleasant, but it seemed to me that I had merely been given the tools with which to contemplate the evidence of my nonenlightenment. My practice had become a vigil—a method of waiting, however patiently, for a future reward.

DZOGCHEN: TAKING THE GOAL AS THE PATH



Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche lived in a hermitage on the southern slope of Shivapuri Mountain, overlooking the Kathmandu Valley. He spent more than twenty years of his life on formal retreat and was deservedly famous for the clarity with which he gave the “pointing-out instruction” of Dzogchen, a formal initiation in which a teacher seeks to impart the experience of selftranscendence directly to a student. I received this teaching from several Dzogchen masters, as well as similar instructions from teachers like Poonja-ji in other traditions, but I never met anyone who spoke about the nature of consciousness as precisely as Tulku Urgyen. In the last five years of his life, I made several trips to Nepal to study with him.

The practice of Dzogchen requires that one be able to experience the intrinsic selflessness of awareness in every moment (that is, when one is not otherwise distracted by thought)—which is to say that for a Dzogchen meditator, mindfulness must be synonymous with dispelling the illusion of the self. Rather than teach a technique of meditation—such as paying close attention to one’s breathing—a Dzogchen master must precipitate an insight on the basis of which a student can thereafter practice a form of awareness (Tibetan: rigpa) that is unencumbered by subject/object dualism. Thus, it is often said that, in Dzogchen, one “takes the goal as the path,” because the freedom from self that one might otherwise seek is the very thing that one practices. The goal of Dzogchen, if one can call it such, is to grow increasingly familiar with this way of being in the world.

In my experience, some Dzogchen masters are better teachers than others. I have been in the presence of several of the most revered Tibetan lamas of our time while they were ostensibly teaching Dzogchen, and most of them simply described this view of consciousness without giving clear instructions on how to glimpse it. The genius of Tulku Urgyen was that he could point out the nature of mind with the precision and matter-of-factness of teaching a person how to thread a needle and could get an ordinary meditator like me to recognize that consciousness is intrinsically free of self. There might be some initial struggle and uncertainty, depending on the student, but once the truth of nonduality had been glimpsed, it became obvious that it was always available—and there was never any doubt about how to see it again. I came to Tulku Urgyen yearning for the experience of self-transcendence, and in a few minutes he showed me
that I had no self to transcend.

In my view, there is nothing supernatural, or even mysterious, about this transmission of wisdom from master to disciple. Tulku Urgyen’s effect on me came purely from the clarity of his teaching. As it is with any challenging endeavor, the difference between being utterly misled by false information, being nudged in the general direction, and being precisely guided by an expert is difficult to overstate.

 Taboos and miscellaneous

It is considered bad form in most spiritual circles, especially among Buddhists, to make claims about one’s own realization. However, I think this taboo comes at a high price, because it allows people to remain confused about how to practice. So I will describe my experience plainly.

Before meeting Tulku Urgyen, I had spent at least a year practicing vipassana on silent retreats. The experience of self-transcendence was not entirely unknown to me. I could remember moments when the distance between the observer and the observed had seemed to vanish, but I viewed these experiences as being dependent on conditions of extreme mental concentration. Consequently, I thought they were unavailable in more ordinary moments, outside intensive retreat. But after a few minutes, Tulku Urgyen simply handed me the ability to cut through the illusion of the self directly, even in ordinary states of consciousness. This instruction was, without question, the most important thing I have ever been explicitly taught by another human being.

And whatever the traditional liabilities of the guru-devotee relationship, I know from direct experience that it is possible to meet a teacher who can deliver the goods.

Unfortunately, to begin the practice of Dzogchen, it is generally necessary to meet a qualified teacher.

But to have their confusion and doubts resolved, most people need to be in a dialogue with a teacher who can answer questions in real time.

However, one can never be sure how much Buddhist religiosity one will be asked to imbibe along the way. My advice is that if you seek out these teachings, don’t be satisfied until you are certain that you understand the practice. Dzogchen is not vague or paradoxical. It is not like Zen, wherein a person can spend years being uncertain whether he is meditating correctly. The practice of recognizing nondual awareness is called trekchod, which means “cutting through” in Tibetan, as in cutting a string cleanly so that both ends fall away. Once one has cut it, there is no doubt that it has been cut. I recommend that you demand the same clarity of your meditation practice.

It is true, however, that the role of guru seems to attract more than its fair share of narcissists and confidence men. Again, this seems to be a natural consequence of the subject matter. One can’t fake being an expert gymnast, a rocket scientist, or even a competent cook—at least not for long—but one can fake being an enlightened adept.

Consider the case of the late Tibetan lama Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche, who was an inspired teacher but also an occasionally violent drunk and a philanderer. As guru to Allen Ginsberg, Trungpa attracted many of America’s most accomplished poets into his orbit. Once, at a Halloween party for senior students—where W. S. Merwin, the future poet laureate of the United States, and his girlfriend, the poet Dana Naone, were guests—Trungpa ordered his bodyguards to forcibly strip a sixty-year-old woman of her clothing and carry her naked around the meditation hall. This made Merwin and Naone more than a little uncomfortable, and they thought it wise to return to their room for the rest of the night. Noticing their absence, Trungpa asked a group of devotees to find the poets and bring them back to the party. When Merwin and Naone refused to open their door, Trungpa instructed his disciples to break it down. The resulting forced entry led to chaos—wherein Merwin, who was then famous for his pacifism, fought off his attackers with a broken beer bottle, stabbing several in the face and arms. The sight of blood, and his horror over his own actions, apparently collapsed Merwin’s defenses, and he and Naone finally allowed themselves to be captured and brought before the guru.

Trungpa, who was by then quite drunk, castigated the pair for their egocentricity and demanded that they take off their clothes. When they refused, he ordered his bodyguards to strip them. By all accounts, Naone became hysterical and begged someone among the crowd of onlookers to call the police. One student attempted to physically intervene. Trungpa himself punched this Samaritan in the face and then ordered his guards to drag the man from the room. Predictably, many of Trungpa’s students viewed the assault on Merwin and Naone as a profound spiritual teaching meant to subdue their egos. Ginsberg, who had not been present at the time, offered the following assessment in an interview: “In the middle of that scene, to yell ‘call the police’—do you realize how vulgar that was? The Wisdom of the East was being unveiled, and she’s going ‘call the police!’ I mean, shit! Fuck that shit! Strip ’em naked, break down the door!" Apart from having produced a perfect jewel of hippie moral confusion, Ginsberg exposed the riddle at the heart of the traditional guru-devotee relationship. No doubt Merwin and Naone’s preference to not dance naked in public had more than a little to do with their attachment to their own privacy and autonomy. And it isn’t inconceivable that a guru could operate in such a coercive and seemingly unethical way out of a sense of compassion. In fact, it may have been conceivable to Merwin and Naone themselves, even in the aftermath of this humiliating ordeal, because they remained at Trungpa’s seminar for several more days to receive further teachings. However, judging from the effect that Trungpa’s wild behavior had on both himself (he apparently died from alcoholism) and his students, it is very difficult to view it as the product of enlightened wisdom.

The scandals surrounding Trungpa’s organization did not end there. Trungpa had groomed a Western student, Ösel Tendzin, to be his successor. Tendzin was the first Westerner to be honored in this way in any lineage of Tibetan Buddhism. His appointment as “Vajra Regent” had even been approved by the Karmapa, one of the most revered Tibetan masters then living. As it happens, Tendzin was bisexual, highly promiscuous, and rather fond of pressuring his straight male devotees to have sex with him as a form of spiritual initiation. He later contracted HIV but continued to have unprotected sex with more than a hundred men and women without telling them of his condition. Trungpa and several people on the board of his organization knew that the regent was ill and did their best to keep it a secret. Once the scandal broke, Tendzin claimed that Trungpa had promised him that he would do no harm as long as he continued his spiritual practice. Apparently, the virus in his blood didn’t care whether he did his spiritual practice or not. At least one of his victims later died of AIDS, having spread HIV to others.

What one encounters in a person like Trungpa is a mind impressively free of shame. This can be a good thing, provided that one happens to also be committed to the well-being of others. But shame serves a crucial social function: It keeps us from behaving like wild animals. Believing in one’s own perfect enlightenment is rather like driving a car without brakes—not a problem if you never need to stop or slow down, but otherwise a terrible idea. The belief that he could live beyond conventional moral constraints is explicitly put forward in Trungpa’s teaching:

[Morality] or discipline is not a matter of binding oneself to a fixed set of laws or patterns. For if a bodhisattva is completely selfless, a completely open person, then he will act according to openness, [and] will not have to follow rules; he will simply fall into patterns. It is impossible for the bodhisattva to destroy or harm other people, because he embodies transcendental generosity. He has opened himself completely and so does not discriminate between this and that. He just acts in accordance with what is. . . . If we are completely open, not watching ourselves at all, but being completely open and communicating with situations as they are, then action is pure, absolute, superior. . . . It is an often-used metaphor that the bodhisattva’s conduct is like the walk of an elephant. Elephants do not hurry; they just walk slowly and surely through the jungle, one step after another. They just sail right along. They never fall nor do they make mistakes.

The state of freedom and effortless goodwill that Trungpa describes here undoubtedly corresponds to an experience that certain people have and to a perception (whether true or not) that others can form about them. But boundless compassion is one thing; inerrancy is another. The notion that one is incapable of making mistakes poses obvious ethical concerns, no matter what one’s level of realization. Anyone who has studied the spread of Eastern spirituality in the West knows that these elephants often stumble—even stampede—injuring themselves and many others in the process.

lauantai 13. helmikuuta 2016

Advaita Enlightenment And Dzogchen Enlightenment

Advaita Enlightenment And
Dzogchen Enlightenment

The next story, told by Sam Harris, demonstrates how the view and experience of enlightenment differ between two teachers: Papaji (H.W.L. Poonja, a well known advaita vedanta guru, disciple of Ramana Maharishi) and Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche, a well known Tibetan vajrayana buddhism and dzogchen master.



I have linked two demonstrative videos where the mentioned teachers meditate. From them one can see how different their states are. The other one being quite confused and unclear and the other one being matured, clear and open.



- Kim Katami, 14.2.2016.




From Sam Harris' book Waking up, ch. 4:

Poonja-ji’s influence on me was profound, especially because it came as a corrective to all the strenuous and unsatisfying efforts I had been making in meditation up to that point. But the dangers inherent in his approach soon became obvious. The all-or-nothing quality of Poonjaji’s teaching obliged him to acknowledge the full enlightenment of any person who was grandiose or manic enough to claim it. Thus, I repeatedly witnessed fellow students declare their complete and undying freedom, all the while appearing quite ordinary—or worse. In certain cases, these people had clearly had some sort of breakthrough, but Poonja-ji’s insistence upon the finality of every legitimate insight led many of them to delude themselves about their spiritual attainments. Some left India and became gurus. From what I could tell, Poonja-ji gave everyone his blessing to spread his teachings in this way. He once suggested that I do it, and yet it was clear to me that I was not qualified to be anyone’s guru. Nearly twenty years have passed, and I’m still not. Of course, from Poonja-ji’s point of view, this is an illusion. And yet there simply is a difference between a person like myself, who is generally distracted by thought, and one who isn’t and cannot be. I don’t know where to place Poonja-ji on this continuum of wisdom, but he appeared to be a lot farther along than his students. Whether Poonja-ji was capable of seeing the difference between himself and other people, I do not know. But his insistence that no difference existed began to seem either dogmatic or delusional.

On one occasion, events conspired to perfectly illuminate the flaw in Poonja-ji’s teaching. A small group of experienced practitioners (among us several teachers of meditation) had organized a trip to India and Nepal to spend ten days with Poonja-ji in Lucknow, followed by ten days in Kathmandu, to receive teachings on the Tibetan Buddhist practice of Dzogchen. As it happened, during our time in Lucknow, a woman from Switzerland became “enlightened” in Poonja-ji’s presence. For the better part of a week, she was celebrated as something akin to the next Buddha. Poonja-ji repeatedly put her forward as evidence of how fully the truth could be realized without making any effort at all in meditation, and we had the pleasure of seeing this woman sit beside Poonja-ji on a raised platform expounding upon how blissful it now was in her corner of the universe. She was, in fact, radiantly happy, and it was by no means clear that Poonja-ji had made a mistake in recognizing her. She would say things like “There is nothing but consciousness, and there is no difference between it and reality itself.” Coming from such a nice, guileless person, there was little reason to doubt the profundity of her experience.

When it came time for our group to leave India for Nepal, this woman asked if she could join us. Because she was such good company, we encouraged her to come along. A few of us were also curious to see how her realization would appear in another context. And so it came to pass that a woman whose enlightenment had just been confirmed by one of the greatest living exponents of Advaita Vedanta was in the room when we received our first teachings from Tulku Urgyen Rinpoche, who was generally thought to be one of the greatest living Dzogchen masters. Of all the Buddhist teachings, those of Dzogchen most closely resemble the teachings of Advaita. The two traditions seek to provoke the same insight into the nonduality of consciousness, but, generally speaking, only Dzogchen makes it absolutely clear that one must practice this insight to the point of stability and that one can do so without succumbing to the dualistic striving that haunts most other paths.

At a certain point in our discussions with Tulku Urgyen, our Swiss prodigy declared her boundless freedom in terms similar to those she had used to such great effect with Poonja-ji. After a few highly amusing exchanges, during which we watched Tulku Urgyen struggle to understand what our translator was telling him, he gave a short laugh and looked the woman over with renewed interest.

“How long has it been since you were last lost in thought?”
he asked.
“I haven’t had any thoughts for over a week,”
the woman replied.
Tulku Urgyen smiled.
“A week?”
“Yes.”
“No thoughts?”
“No, my mind is completely still. It’s just pure consciousness.”
“That’s very interesting. Okay, so this is what is going to happen now: We are all going to wait for you to have your next thought. There’s no hurry. We are all very patient people. We are just going to sit here and wait. Please tell us when you notice a thought arise in your mind.”

It is difficult to convey what a brilliant and subtle intervention this was. It may have been the most inspired moment of teaching I have ever witnessed. After a few moments, a look of doubt appeared on our friend’s face.

“Okay... Wait a minute... Oh... That could have been a thought there... Okay...”
Over the next thirty seconds, we watched this woman’s enlightenment completely unravel. It became clear that she had been merely thinking about how expansive her experience of consciousness had become—how it was perfectly free of thought, immaculate, just like space—without noticing that she was thinking incessantly. She had been telling herself the story of her enlightenment—and she had been getting away with it because she happened to be an extraordinarily happy person for whom everything was going very well for the time being.

This was the danger of nondual teachings of the sort that Poonja-ji was handing out to all comers. It was easy to delude oneself into thinking that one had achieved a permanent breakthrough, especially because he insisted that all breakthroughs must be permanent. What the Dzogchen teachings make clear, however, is that thinking about what is beyond thought is still thinking, and a glimpse of selflessness is generally only the beginning of a process that must reach fruition. Being able to stand perfectly free of the feeling of self is the start of one’s spiritual journey, not its end.”

Links


Advaita-valaistuminen ja Dzogchen-valaistuminen

Advaita-valaistuminen ja

Dzogchen-valaistuminen



Seuraava Sam Harrisin kertoma tarina kertoo erinomaisesn selkeästi kuinka merkittävästi tunnetun advaita vedanta gurun ja Ramana Maharishin oppilaan, Papajin (H.W.L Poonja) ja tunnetun tiibetiläisen dzogchenmestarin Tulku Urgyen Rinpochen näkemykset ja kokemukset valaistumisesta eroavat toisistaan.



On tosiasia, että se minkä olen itse määrittänyt termillä ”herääminen” on osa huomattavan laajaa mielen puhdistamisen kokonaisuutta, jota myös henkisen kehityksen poluksi kutsutaan.



Olen linkittänyt alle kaksi demonstratiivista videota joilla em. opettajat meditoivat. Niistä voi nähdä kuinka erilaisessa mielenmaisemassa he ovat, toinen tunkkaisen sekavassa, toinen selkeässä ja avarassa.



Olen linkittänyt myös tekemäni bhumi-analyysin, joka esittää täsmällisen kehitysasteen jolla sekä Papaji, että Tulku Urgyen olivat.



- Kim Katami, 14.2.2016.



Open Heart,








Sitaatti Sam Harrisin kirjasta ”Herääminen. Opas uskonnottomaan henkisyyteen” s. 158-161, alkuteos Waking up.



”Poonjaji (Papaji) vaikutti minuun syvällisesti erityisesti, koska hänen käsityksensä olivat vastapainoa siihenastisille, uuvuttaville ja epätyydyttäville ponnisteluilleni meditaation parissa. Mutta hänen menetelmänsä sisältyvät vaarat kävivät pian ilmi. Poonjajin kaikki tai ei mitään-opetustyyli velvoitti hänet tunnustamaan valaistuneeksi jokaisen, joka oli kyllin mahtaileva tai kiihkomielinen julistaaksen sitä olevansa. Niinpä todistin toistuvasti, kuinka kanssaopiskelijani julistivat saavuttaneensa täydellisen ja ikuisen vapauden, vaikka mikään heissä ei poikennut tavallisesta – tai jos poikkesi, niin huonoon suuntaan. Joissakin tapauksissa nämä ihmiset olivat selvästi tehneet jonkinlaisen läpimurron, mutta koska Poonjaji piti itsepintaisesti kiinni siitä, että oivallus on todellinen vain, jos se on lopullinen, se sai monet pettämään itseään henkisten saavutusten suhteen. Jotkut lähtivät Intiasta ja ryhtyivät guruiksi. Tietääkseni heillä kaikilla oli Poonjajin siunaus levittää hänen oppejaan. Kerran hän ehdotti sitä minullekin, vaikka minulle itselleni oli selvää, että minusta ei ollut kenenkään guruksi. Lähes kaksikymmentä vuotta myöhemmin minusta ei edelleenkään ole siihen. Poonjajin näkökulmasta tämä on tietenkin harhaa. Mutta on yksinkertaisesti eri asia olla minunkaltaiseni ihminen, joka tavallisesti ajautuu ajatusten vietäväksi, kuin joku, jolle niin ei käy ja jolle se ei ylipäätään ole edes mahdollista. En tiedä, mihin Poonjaji sijoittuu tällä viisauden jatkumolla, mutta hän vaikutti olevan paljon oppilaitaan pidemmällä. En tiedä, pystyikö Poonjaji näkemään itsensä ja muiden välisen eron. Hänen hellittämätön näkemyksensä, jonka mukaan mitään eroa ei ole, alkoi kuitenkin vaikuttaa dogmaattiselta ja harhaiselta.



Erään tapahtumasarjan seurauksena Poonjajin opetusten epäkohdat nousivat selvästi esiin. Pieni ryhmä kokeneita meditaation harjoittajia (joukossamme oli monta meditaatio-opettajaa) oli järjestänyt matkan Intiaan ja Nepaliin. Tarkoituksena oli viettää kymmenen päivää Lucknow'ssa Poonjajin luona ja sen jälkeen opiskella Kathmandussa kymmenen päivää tiibetinbuddhalaista dzogchenharjoitusta. Kuinka ollakaan, Lucknow'ssa ollessamme eräs sveitsiläinen nainen ”valaistui” Poonjajin läsnäollessa. Suurimman osan viikkoa naista juhlittiin kuin uutta Buddhaa. Poonjaji esitti toistuvasti naisen olevan todiste siitä, että totuuden täydellinen oivaltaminen on mahdollista, vaikka ei meditoisi lainkaan, ja meillä oli ilo nähdä naisen istuvan Poonjajin vierellä korokkeella ja kuulla hänen selittävän, kuinka autuasta hänen olonsa maailmankaikkeudessa nyt olikaan. Hän todella säteili iloa, eikä mikään viitannut siihen, että Poonjaji olisi erehtynyt tunnustaessaan hänet. Naisella oli tapana sanoa sellaisia kuin ”Ei ole muuta kuin tietoisuus, eikä sen ja todellisuuden välillä ole mitään eroa.” Hän oli erittäin mukava ja vilpitön ihminen, eikä hänen kokemuksensa syvyyttä ollut siksi syytä epäillä.



Kun tuli aika meidän ryhmämme lähteä Intiasta Nepaliin, nainen kysyi, saisiko hän tulla mukaamme. Hän oli hyvää seuraa, joten kehotimme häntä lähtemään matkaamme. Jotkut meistä olivat myös uteliaita näkemään, miten hänen valaistumisensa ilmenisi toisenlaisessa ympäristössä. Ja niin nainen, jonka valaistumisen oli vastikään vahvistanut yksi merkittävimmistä advaita vedantan elossa olevista edustajista, istui samassa huoneessa, jossa saimme ensimmäiset opetuksemme Tulku Urgyen Rinpochelta, jota pidettiin yleisesti yhtenä merkittävimmistä elossa olevista dzogchenmestareista.



Kaikista buddhalaisista opeista dzogchenin opit muistuttavat eniten advaitan oppeja. Molemmissa perinteissä pyritään samaan oivallukseen, näkemään tietoisuuden ei-dualistinen luonne, mutta yleensä vain dzogchen tekee ehdottoman selväksi, että tämä oivallus vaatii harjoittamista, kunnes se muuttuu pysyväksi eikä ihminen enää joudu antamaan periksi dualistisille pyrkimyksille, jotka ovat useimpien muiden polkujen vaivana.



Eräässä vaiheessa Tulku Urgyenin kanssa käymäämme keskustelua sveitsiläinen ihmenaisemme puhkesi julistamaan ääretöntä vapauden tilaansa käyttäen samoja ilmauksia, joilla oli niin suuri vaikutus Poonjajihin. Saimme seurata paria hupaisaa sananvaihtoa, joiden aikana Tulku Urgyen yritti ymmärtää, mitä tulkkimme hänelle kertoi. Lopulta hän naurahti lyhyesti ja katsoi naista entistä kiinnostuneemmin.



Koska viimeksi ajatukset valtasivat sinut?” hän kysyi.

Minulla ei ole ollut ainuttakaan ajatusta yli viikkoon”, nainen vastasi.

Tulku Urgyen hymyili.

Viikkoon?”

Niin.”

Ei lainkaan ajatuksia?”

Ei, mieleni on täysin rauhallinen. On vain puhdas tietoisuus.”

Erittäin mielenkiintoista. Nyt tehdään niin, että me kaikki odotamme, että sinulle tulee ajatus. Ei ole mitään kiirettä. Me kaikki olemme hyvin kärsivällisiä ihmisiä. Me vain istumme tässä ja odotamme. Kerrotko sitten, kun huomaat mielessäsi ajatuksen.”



Tämän väliintulon nerokkuutta ja hienovaraisuutta on vaikea pukea sanoiksi. Se saattoi hyvin olla kaikkein innostavin opetustilanne, missä olen koskaan ollut.

Hetken kuluttua ystävämme kasvoille ilmestyi epäilevä ilme.



Okei... Hetkinen... Öh... Tuo oli ehkä ajatus... Okei...”



Seuraavan puolen minuutin aikana näimme, kuinka naisen valaistuminen haihtui kuin tuhka tuuleen. Oli selvää, että hän oli vain ajatellut, kuinka avara hänen tietoisuudestaan oli tullut, että siinä ei ollut ajatuksen ajatusta, että se oli täydellisen puhdas, kuin avaruus, huomaamatta ajattelevansa lakkaamatta. Hän oli kertonut itselleen valaistuneensa ja uskonut siihen, koska hän sattui olemaan epätavallisen iloinen ihminen, jonka elämässä kaikki oli tuolloin erittäin hyvällä tolalla.



Tällainen oli vaara, joka piili Poonjajin luokseen tuleville jakamissa ei-dualistisissa opetuksissa. Itseään oli helppo pettää ja ajatella saavuttaneensa pysyvän läpimurron, varsinkin koska Poonjaji piti itsepintaisesti kiinni siitä, että kaikkien läpimurtojen on väistämättä oltava pysyviä. Dzogchen-opetukset tekevät selväksi, että sen ajattelu, mikä on ajattelun tuolla puolen, on yhä ajattelua, ja välähdys minättömyydestä on yleensä vain alku prosessille, joka tulee vielä loppuun saakka. Täydellinen irrottautuminen minuudesta on vasta henkisen matkan alku, ei sen päätepiste.”



Linkkejä